University to Canadian Ethics Professor: Take the Jab or Lose Your Job

This article, written by Arjun Walia and published by The Pulse last September 8, 2021, features a 5-minute video of Dr. Julie Ponesse, a Canadian Ethics Professor, dismissed from her post because she refused to take the COVID jab.

A video of Dr. Ponesse was shared through the Canadian Covid Care Alliance (CCCA) Instagram account, and the message was very compelling and powerful. A few words to quote: “I have plenty of vaccines in my life, but I was never forced to take one. It has always been my choice.”

Dr. Ponesse is a member of the CCCA, a group comprising over a hundred Canadian medical doctors, scientists, healthcare workers, and professors who are doing their best to raise awareness about COVID-related issues and solutions. They aim to have a more complete, scientific, and balanced discussion around COVID than government and mainstream media offer. One reason Dr. Ponesse says that she holds her ground because nothing about the inoculation that is ethical and entirely unsafe.

Editor’s Note: The article raised a question we have been asking for a long time: is the vaccine a necessary medical intervention for all people? If you have been following this website, then you know the answer to this.

Why do governments and most media people ignore doctors and scientists who want to offer alternative measures to ease the pandemic? If science it to become responsive, it will require an open debate among various scientists. This is especially important in the middle of a health crisis, where all experts weigh in to find the best solution. But when dialogue and information are censored and automatically criticized, it is no longer about science. It is medical tyranny.

Here are the other implications of the article attached below:

First, after 18 months of various degrees of lockdowns, we are still in a state of emergency. Perhaps it is time to ask, are the measures implemented by our governments adequate, or are we still in the trial-and-error phase? [Read Covid Mandates: Unscientific, Irrational and Fraudulent, Dozens of Reasons to Stop Them Now.]

We know the answer to that, but it will be better to have a collective voice to contest the policies. Some groups have united to challenge authorities about these outrageous mandates. [See Lawyers sue Canadian government to halt all COVID measures forced upon children; Brussels court orders Belgian state to lift all coronavirus measures; Doctors slam Australian COVID-19 policies; 130+ UK doctors express “grave concerns” over government’s handling of pandemic; Global alliance of doctors calls for an end to all lockdowns and vaccinations; Broad national coalition of groups questioning lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations request dialog with Philippine military and police.]

Second, despite the censorship and exclusion, people are waking up grounded and firm in their beliefs that they are fighting for the right cause. Why are the mainstream media, the so-called guardians of right to speech and expression, so ready to smear the reputations of those who offer an alternative narrative? Are the media people sheer pawns to this despotism? [See Trusted News Initiative or Corrupted News Initiative? Mission: Systematic censorship of the world’s top public health experts; CNN technical director admits network used fear in COVID coverage to drive ratings up; Facebook whistleblowers reveal to Project Veritas how the company plans to curb vaccine hesitancy Another media insider reveals how network uses corrupt practices to promote COVID vaccines and fake news].

Third, why do authorities push for an unnecessary medical procedure against an individual’s will? These vaccines have known side effects, and they are still in the experimental phase. Governments cannot mandate them. [Read 57 leading scientists, doctors, and public policy experts call for immediate halt to COVID vaccine rollout; The approval of the Pfizer jab is not about health. It was about forcing people to take the jab.; Without informed consent, COVID vaccines are illegal]

What is the plan behind this inoculation agenda? [See This is the reason why authorities want 100% COVID vaccination.]

Fourth, suppose it’s really about health and the public’s interests, in that case, differing opinions should be heard and execute what is most appropriate. Why exclude those scientists who are merely doing their duties to allay health emergencies? [Read Trusted News Initiative or Corrupted News Initiative? Mission: Systematic censorship of the world’s top public health experts; The Pandemic of Censorship; Another frontliner doctor pushes back against censorship; LinkedIn censors account of Dr. Robert Malone, mRNA technology pioneer; YouTube deletes 2015 video of Nobel Prize winner Dr. Satoshi Ōmura discussing ivermectin.]

Fifth, if US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), Yellow Card System in the UK, Eudravigilance, and other vaccine adverse events reporting systems are to perform their intended purpose, governments should have stopped mass inoculations by now [vaccines have caused massive injuries and deaths, see Vaccine injuries reach 56,869 – VAERS, Study: Risk of death following vaccination higher than COVID-19 among the most vulnerable groups].

Unfortunately, pharmacovigilance failed to be vigilant this time. Despite the high fatality rate following inoculation, covid injections are still peddled as safe and effective. Why? Where is the data that supports this narrative? [Several experts are already saying these “vaccines” are dangerous, Covid Vaccines are Bioweapons for Mass Genocide; Confidential documents reveal plans for massive bioweapon attacks; COVID vaccines are bioweapons. Here are the many ways they can injure you.]

Last, there is nothing safe with these covid doses. Once you take it, it’s a suicide. [See Dr. Tess Lawrie: COVID vaccines unsafe for human use; Dr. David Martin: Experimental mRNA “vaccines” are not vaccines, they are a medical device; AAPS: Blood clots happen with all COVID vaccines; Experimental mRNA vaccines could cause long term chronic illnesses; New York Times: Some recipients of experimental COVID vaccines developing rare autoimmune disease after jab; Guillian-Barre Syndrome after COVID vaccination more common than previously reported; What is pathogenic priming?; Countries report increased cases after using Sinovac vaccine.]

If governments are convinced of the safety of these vaccines, then they do not need to give indemnity to vaccine developers. The mere existence of the waiver before vaccination is proof that the vaccines are in the experimental phase and that governments are afraid of taking responsibility for adverse effects cause by these experimental shots.

Read Original Article

Read Online

Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.

Read Offline

Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.

1 thought on “University to Canadian Ethics Professor: Take the Jab or Lose Your Job

  1. An observation for the writer of the article ‘University to Canadian Ethics Professor: Take the Jab or Lose Your Job’, September 30, 2021 Shell Lorenzo’
    This comment “or are we still in the trial-and-error phase?” could just as well read “or are we still in the trial-and-TERROR phase?”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *