The approval of the Pfizer jab is not about health. It was about forcing people to take the jab.

The “approval” of the Pfizer vaccine is contentious. For one, the Pfizer vaccine as we know it was not approved. The Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer vaccine was extended. Second, the Cominarty vaccine, which is similar to the Pfizer vaccine, was approved by the FDA but it is not yet available in the market and is yet to be produced. Hopefully, this article will clear up the confusion.

Beyond these, there is the issue of how the approval came about when the results of the clinical trials are not yet available. Also, the recently released extension of the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) document from FDA[1] has opened a can of worms.

How did the FDA grant full approval to the Cominarty vaccine when it is still in the clinical trial phase?[2] The clinical trials were supposed to last for two years, what policy allowed the FDA to approve the vaccine based on short-term, non-peer-reviewed data? On what data did the FDA base its decision? [The problem with this process was already raised last year, see Emergency approvals before end of clinical trials end could complicate efforts to study long-term effects of vaccine].

Did the FDA skip important steps in the approval process? No other scientist has seen the raw data collected by Pfizer during the clinical trial, as evidenced by statements recently released by Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate who serves as a consumer representative on FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee.[3] Given the host of other medical disasters related to vaccines, one would think that governments would be more careful in regulating new drugs and medical products.[4] and … Continue reading

Not only is the government ignoring the thousands of serious adverse effects and deaths occurring after vaccination, but they are also actively covering up the dangers of the Pfizer vaccine. We must ask: why?

Why is the government rushing to approve a vaccine when it knows that the technology and ingredients used to make it are all new and untested? Why does the government remain complicit with pharmacovigilance? Why are governments engaging in mind games with their citizens?

To better understand the issue of the extension of the Pfizer EUA we raised above, let us look at an article written by Robert Kennedy, Jr. and Dr. Meryll Nass.

Page 2, footnote 8 of the FDA document (cited above) states that the current Pfizer COVID vaccines on the market and Comirnaty are legally distinct but can be used interchangeably due to their “similar formulations”. Why would the FDA make such a distinction?

Kennedy and Nass explain: “There is a huge real-world difference between products approved under EUA compared with those the FDA fully licensed. EUA products are experimental under U.S. law…EUA-approved COVID vaccines have an extraordinary liability shield…[while]Comirnaty are subject to the same product liability laws as other U.S. products…because adults injured by the vaccine will be able to show that the manufacturer knew of the problems with the product, jury awards could be astronomical. Pfizer is therefore unlikely to allow any American to take a Comirnaty vaccine until it can somehow arrange immunity for this product.”

The “approval” then is nothing more than a license for businesses and schools to impose mandatory jabs, hence helping Pfizer to unload stocks that are exposed as “unnecessarily dangerous” and has been rendered obsolete by the Delta variant. [See The evidence is in: Vaccines have failed, more dangerous than the virus, Vaccines do not fully control Delta variant: Majority of COVID deaths are from vaccinated. Evidence of dangerous ADE at work, Peer-reviewed research shows mRNA vaccines can cause neurodegenerative diseases, COVID Vaccines Do Not Prevent Transmission, Will Lead to a Variant Killing 35% of People it Infects, New evidence explains how mRNA vaccines cause organ damage, FDA knew COVID vaccines would lead to severe adverse events, sanitized info was given to people to prevent vaccine-hesitancy, Expert evaluation on adverse effects of the Pfizer-COVID-19 vaccination, FDA adds heart inflammation warning to Pfizer, Moderna experimental vaccines, Pfizer’s efficacy drops in Israel, cannot prevent people from getting COVID Delta variant].

And since Pfizer has not yet started producing the Comirnaty vaccine, most of the Pfizer COVID vaccines that are still being rolled out are still the same ones that are under EUA. Kennedy and Nass say that this is an attempt by the FDA to trick people into giving up their right to refuse an experimental product. They add, if someone orders you to take the vaccine or else risk losing your job, the best thing to do is to ask to see the vial. If it says “Comirnaty”, then it is a fake, licensed product, because this vaccine is not yet available in the market. If it says Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, Janssen, or any of the other COVID vaccines, then it is experimental and you have the right to refuse.

To close this article, we want to reiterate this point: even if Comirnaty was given a “full biologics license”, it does not erase the fact that this vaccine is useless, unnecessary, and dangerous [see Finland study shows vaccines, universal masking, useless against Delta variant, New data shows vaccines useless against COVID in the long-term, France’s long-time vaccine policy chief: covid policy is “completely stupid” and “unethical”, Dr. Robert Malone: COVID vaccines are causing the virus to become more infectious, Vaccines may turn out to be deadlier than COVID, UK Data shows more people died due to COVID injections in 8 months than people who died of COVID-19 in 18 months, Research shows fully vaccinated individuals infected with COVID have become presymptomatic superspreaders, Pro-Vaccine expert warns: Stop mass vaccinations, Scientists Sound Alarm: Vaccines Will Kill Millions].

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *