- Massive Vaccine Deaths and Adverse Events
- Dr. Peter McCullough: “I was absolutely stunned”
- One-Sided, Exaggerated Vaccine Focus Cost 425,000 US Lives
- Vaccinating Asymptomatic Individuals and People Below 50 a Mistake
- Do Not Vaccine People Who Had Covid and Recovered Naturally
- Virus-Stopping Herd Immunity Through Natural Immunity and Early Treatment, Not Vaccines
- The Loss of Conscience and Ethics Among Doctors
- Vaccine Dangers: Tip of the Iceberg
Normally quiet, prestigious scientists are going out of their comfort zone. These mainstream, pro-vaccine scientists are sounding the alarm. While they normally defend and use vaccines, they are concerned about Covid vaccines. They fear that these vaccines may kill millions in the near term and even more in the not-so-distant future. Generations still unborn will also be slaughtered.
Massive Vaccine Deaths and Adverse Events
To understand their concern, let us look at current statistics for deaths and adverse impacts due to Covid vaccines. See Table 1 immediately below.
Table 1. Vaccine Deaths and Adverse Events as of May 2021Table constructed from different sources. For the UK, see https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/doctors-tell-drug-regulators-vaccinating-kids-covid-irresponsible-unethical-unnecessary/. For the … Continue reading
There are a lot of deaths and adverse reactions to the Covid vaccines. But these vaccine adverse impacts are only the tip of the iceberg. The information contained here only comes from a limited number of countries. It does not include the deaths and adverse impacts in other countries including the 91 deaths reported in the Philippines several weeks ago.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/05/24/philippine-fda-reports-79166-adverse-events-91-deaths-following-covid-vaccination/
In addition, the actual deaths and adverse impacts due to the vaccine are under-reported. We have already written about the Harvard study that shows that the VAERS database of the US contains only 1% or less of the actual deaths and adverse events that are happening in US society.Electronic Support for Public Health–Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (ESP: VAERS) Inclusive dates: 12/01/07 – 09/30/10 Principal Investigator: Lazarus, Ross, MBBS, MPH, MMed, GDCompSci. … Continue reading It could be the same for the UK. The EU may be capturing more of the actual numbers. It is not clear by how much.
Using the Harvard study estimates for both the US and the UK and a 10% estimate for the EU database called EUDRA Vigilance or the European Data Base of Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions Report, let us calculate a more realistic estimate of the havoc that these Covid vaccines are creating in these countries and region. See Table 2.
Table 2. Adjusted Vaccine Deaths and Adverse Events, May 2021
These pro-vaccine scientists are also shocked at the many irregularities plaguing the development and performance of Covid vaccines.
Current vaccine deaths have surpassed ALL vaccine deaths recorded at the US VAERS or the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System for the last 30 years if we count the latest death figures for the US cited above.https://www.virginiastoner.com/writing/2021/5/4/the-deadly-covid-19-vaccine-coverup
Why is there no display of concern from authorities, regulatory or otherwise?
Instead CDC said: ‘Monitoring … indicates reassuring safety profiles for COVID-19 vaccines. … No unusual or unexpected reporting patterns were detected.’ Already, in the early days, the historical average was 12 deaths per month versus 113 deaths for the Covid vaccine in the first month.Ibid.
Normally, 50 deaths would cause vaccines to be taken out of the market.https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/05/joseph-mercola/government-scrubs-stats-on-vaccine-related-deaths/ We now have tens of thousands of deaths and the Covid vaccines continue to be aggressively promoted. Why are these hazardous vaccines not taken out of the market?
They are scandalized when regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical companies all deny any link between vaccination and deaths. They know that 57% of those who died were killed within 48 hours after taking the vaccines.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/05/24/new-study-vaccines-are-the-likely-cause-of-adverse-effects-and-deaths-following-vaccination/
They are puzzled. Why did they collapse the normally long-term development period for most vaccines, ranging from 7 to 29 years, to one year.https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/8qMDseJTE3vCFiYec/how-long-does-it-take-to-research-and-develop-a-new-vaccine Why is there the rush?
Why are Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) given to experimental vaccines when there is no health emergency, especially when there are other very safe early treatment medicinal interventions available?https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/05/25/nicanor-perlas-guidebook-to-end-lockdowns-now-an-executive-summary/
Amidst all these, why is there a massive, non-stop, hard-line and insistent promotion of these dangerous vaccines all over the world?
Dr. Peter McCullough: “I was absolutely stunned”
What are some of these mainstream pro-vaccine scientists saying? We will take the case of Dr. Peter McCullough. In the future we will also talk about the work and perspective of other pro-vaccine scientists who are now raising strong concerns about the dangers of Covid vaccines.
Dr. Peter McCullough is an internist and cardiologist and professor of medicine at Texas A&M University School of Medicine. He is the editor of two major journals. In his field dealing with the heart and kidneys, he is the most published person in the world and in the history of that field.
In addition, he published a peer-reviewed scientific article on COVID-19 entitled, “Pathophysiologic Basis And Rationale For Early Ambulatory Treatment” in the August 8, 2020 issue of the American Journal of Medicine, a top ranking scientific publication. It became the most cited paper in all medical fields at that time.
I am giving this detailed background on Dr. McCullough because he is a totally mainstream, prestigious, pro-vaccine scientist as anyone can get. At the same time, he is a real scientist who goes where the facts and evidence lead. He was awakened with the scientific scandal going on in the early days of COVID-19.
This is what he said: “… there were 50,000 papers in the peer-reviewed literature on COVID. Not a single one told a doctor how to treat it. Not a single one. … I was absolutely stunned.”https://dryburgh.com/peter-mccullough-covid19-home-treatment/. All references to and statements by Dr. McCullough are taken from this source. This article reports on and gives a full transcript of … Continue reading
When he uploaded a YouTube version of his research, YouTube banned his video because he violated the “terms of the community”. In short, he was censored. This is why many people then did not know about the scientific perspectives of Dr. McCullough.
Here are some statements of Dr. McCullough that have become viral in alternative media platforms, where almost all the dissenting prestigious scientists, have turned to in order to relay their message to the millions who are now in these new channels. Big Tech social media and spin-doctors of the mainstream media have censored their different non-alarmist version of COVID-19 (that is, there is no pandemic)
One-Sided, Exaggerated Vaccine Focus Cost 425,000 US Lives
On March 10, 2021, Dr. McCullough testified before a Senate HHS Committee in Texas.
The essence of his testimony is this:
The one-track excessive focus on vaccines condemned 425,000 US citizens to die due to the neglect of doctors on early treatment options. This neglect was encouraged by the suppression and censorship by regulatory agencies and tainted media on safe and effective medical drugs like Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, among others.
In the words of Dr. McCullough: ‘And then Warp Speed went full tilt for vaccine development. And there was a silencing of any information on treatment. Any. Silencing. Scrubbed [removed] from Twitter, YouTube. Can’t get papers published on this. You can’t, we can’t even get information out in our own medical literature on this. There’s been a complete scrubbing.’
On top of that, the vaccine trials were not promising. ‘ … fewer than 1% in the vaccine and the placebo actually get COVID. Fewer than 1%. The vaccine is going to have a 1% public health impact.’
Dr. McCullough is talking about effectiveness, not efficacy, of the vaccines. For example, the 95% efficacy claims of Pfizer, for example, actually means less than 1% effectiveness.” Effectiveness is calculated on the basis of Absolute Risk Reduction. (See this reference for more details on the difference between efficacy and effectiveness.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/05/31/covid-vaccines-not-as-effective-as-you-think/ and https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/03/02/study-public-misled-about-the-efficacy-reports-of-mrna-vaccines/
Vaccinating Asymptomatic Individuals and People Below 50 a Mistake
He goes on to question the rationale for vaccinating asymptomatic individuals. He testifies:
“One of the mistakes I heard today as a rationale for vaccination is asymptomatic spread. And I want you to be very clear about this. My opinion is there is a low degree, if any, of asymptomatic spread. Sick person gives it to sick person.”
He then goes on to cite a study by Chinese scientists published in British Medical Journal. The Chinese examined 11 million people and they could not find asymptomatic spread. He laments that the belief that asymptomatic people COVID-19 ‘been one of [the] important pieces of misinformation.’
Dr. McCullough then continues to criticize the current practice of vaccinating people under 50. He says: “People under 50, who fundamentally have no health risks, there’s no scientific rationale for them to ever become vaccinated.”
Do Not Vaccine People Who Had Covid and Recovered Naturally
Then Dr. McCullough shares a very important piece of scientific information. ‘People who develop COVID have complete and durable immunity – a very important principle – complete and durable. You can’t beat natural immunity. You can’t vaccinate on top of it and make it better. There’s no scientific, clinical, or safety rationale for ever vaccinating a COVID recovered patient.’ [Emphasis added.]
He, however, does not mention nor give the scientific reason why it is dangerous to vaccinate people who already got the virus and are now naturally immune to it. A fairly extensive scientific study has recently shown that those who had Covid and recovered (COVID-recovered) have a higher risk of adverse side effects from the vaccines than those who have not had COVID-19. Overall, the risk of getting any kind of adverse effects was 108% greater for the COVID-recovered as compared with those who had no Covid before their vaccination.“Self-Reported Real-World Safety and Reactogenicity of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Vaccine Recipient Survey.” https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/11/3/249/htm
It is worthy to note that, in this same study, the COVID-recovered had a 254% risk of getting anaphylaxis, a dangerous adverse effect, as compared with those who did not have COVID-19 before they were vaccinated. This high risk appeared more clearly after the patient took a second dose of the vaccine.
After a year of COVID-19, most people in the world who survived COVID-19 most likely have developed natural immunity to the disease. This is also most likely in the Philippines where, on the average, 99.99% of Filipinos, who had COVID-19 survived the disease due to their natural immune system.
So it is a huge mistake to be almost forcing mass vaccination in a population that, most likely, has achieved herd immunity. We all know many Filipinos did not follow the quarantine regulations. Even if they did wear facemasks 24/7, these people were not being protected from COVID-19. There is no scientific evidence that facemasks work.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2020/11/23/danish-mask-study-now-published-masks-do-not-reduce-sars-cov-2-infection/
Virus-Stopping Herd Immunity Through Natural Immunity and Early Treatment, Not Vaccines
In this context, Dr. McCullough drops a bombshell. He said that the calculation he was familiar with showed that Texas is ‘at 80% herd immunity right now with no vaccine effect. 80%.’ So, there is no need for mass vaccinations when the natural immunity of individuals has already aggregated to achieve population or herd immunity.
Then he comes to one of the most important points of his Senate testimony. COVID-19 is a treatable disease if the treatment is done early. Here is what he said.
‘COVID-19 has always been a treatable illness. A very large study from McKinney, Texas, (and) another one from New York City, show that when doctors treat patients early, who are over age 50 with medical problems, with a sequence multi-drug approach with the available drugs, … (there is) an 85% reduction in hospitalizations and death. 85%. 85%. I want you to remember that number. 85%. …. We have over 500,000 deaths in the United States. The preventable fraction could have been as high as 85%.’
In short, early treatment could have saved the lives of 425,000 people in the US alone!
The Loss of Conscience and Ethics Among Doctors
Then he goes on a long lament regarding the loss of medical ethics among his fellow doctors and medical institutions in general. He then says that it is ‘unimaginable’ that the US can have ‘such a complete and total blind spot’ as far as early treatment is concerned.
‘I blame the doctors for not stepping up. Where was the medical society stepping up and putting effort on this? How about from the federal and state agencies?’
He continues to point out that medical doctors do not really care about the fate of their patients because the latter do not do their best, given what’s available, to treat COVID-19 patients.
Quoting some doctors he knows: “I don’t treat COVID. That’s, I don’t care anymore. That’s a loss of compassion…. So we have a crisis of compassion in our country, in the medical field. That’s in our house right now. …. the Hippocratic oath [is] going out. And that’s on us. And I’m telling you, we have a real self-check to do in the house of medicine.’
You will note that his testimony basically echoes what many other scientists have been saying all these months. The disreputable “fact-checkers”, Big Tech (FB, YouTube, etc.), and mainstream media (CNN, NYT, others) have labeled these other prestigious scientists as “anti-vaxxers” or “conspiracy theorists”. That they would also dismiss a respected pro-vaccine scientist and doctor like Dr. McCullough clearly reveals these people and institutions are not seeking the truth but advancing a control agenda.
Vaccine Dangers: Tip of the Iceberg
In the paragraphs above, we saw some of engines of destruction of Covid vaccines:
- Warp Speed reckless development of Covid vaccines;
- Continued push by governments, media, and Big Pharma, and others to vaccinate billions despite the horrifying slaughter already happening;
- Vaccination of those who do not need the vaccines including asymptomatic individuals, Covid-recovered, and those below 50
- Suppressing cheap and effective treatments to push the vaccines;
- Censoring of top pro-vaccine scientists issuing warnings about improper use of vaccines;
- Loss of ethical moorings of medical doctors amidst the vaccination scandals.
We saw all these converging towards one horrific picture of the on-going genocide of humanity:
- massive deaths and injuries of vaccines, in the millions, deaths that have already surpassed all deaths in the US due to vaccines in the last 30 years.
All these are just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the disastrous havoc that vaccines are punishing humanity with. In future articles, written by others, or us, we will touch on other appalling vaccine dangers that are not reported in the mainstream quad media including:
- Pathogenic priming;
- Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE)
- Spike proteins in vaccines that are more toxic than the COVID-19 virus itself;
- Vaccine shedding where spike proteins coming from the vaccinated can harm the non-vaccinated;
- Self-vaccinating gene therapy modalities;
- Genome modifying gene therapy masquerading as vaccines; and
- Scientific evidence that mRNA can integrate with the human genome thereby passing toxic spike proteins to your children and your children’s children and on.
Also, we must never forget that these vaccines will not end the lockdowns, the infections, and disease transmission. They were never meant to do so.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/02/09/nicanor-perlas-the-vaccine-delusion-part-1-cbcp-pro-vaccine-decision-huge-mistake-vaccines-will-not-remove-lockdowns/ They are just an excuse to drag humanity in the labyrinth of a dark future where we slowly by sure begin to lose our full humanity, whether through the continued manipulation of our body,Thru the mRNA vaccine as a platform for the incorporation of all kinds of synthetic RNA fragments with underdetermined effects. the enslavement of our soul through consciously-designed fear mongering,https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/02/14/fear-appeal-the-science-of-using-fear-to-manipulate-people-into-submission/, … Continue reading and the eclipse of our spirit by developing a pervasive sense of a hopeless future.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2020/06/26/hopeline-hotline-for-depressed-and-suicidal-filipinos-record-200-increase-in-calls/ and … Continue reading
In the end, after reading all these, we hope that you, the readers, will really think very hard on whether you will allow yourselves to gamble your life on a very dangerous and toxic vaccine even if the survival rate for those infected with this relatively harmless virus is, on the average, 99.99%.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/05/25/nicanor-perlas-guidebook-to-end-lockdowns-now-an-executive-summary/
We hope you make the right choice, for yourself, and for the future of humanity. Our lives mean much more than simply becoming another death statistic in the juggernaut of the vaccine death machine of a de facto totalitarian state. It is time to creatively and legally resist this madness!