If you are using the Audiate feature (the play button below the article title), please give some time for the audio to load. The site is converting the text to speech and since this is a long article, the conversion will take a long time. Thank you for your patience.
- PART I: INTRODUCTION
- Role of Censorship in Propping Up the Health Emergency Narrative
- Science in this Guidebook: Similar to What is Used to End Lockdowns Worldwide
- Why Should We Act?
- Broad-based Resistance to Lockdowns Has Emerged
- Guidebook to Sharpen Strategic Direction and Impact of the Resistance
- Overview Summary of How We Can Stop the Lockdowns
- Part 2. SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE DEBUNKING THE “HEALTH EMERGENCY” NARRATIVE
- The virus is not deadly.
- In reality, COVID-19 is a hoax, a scamdemic, a manufactured pandemic. … Continue reading
- Lockdowns do not work. … Continue reading
- Facemasks are ineffective and dangerous to one’s health.
- COVID-19 vaccines are super-dangerous and will not end infections and lockdownshttps://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/02/09/nicanor-perlas-the-vaccine-delusion-part-1-cbcp-pro-vaccine-decision-huge-mistake-vaccines-will-not-remove-lockdowns/
- PART III: SAFE MEDICAL ALTERNATIVES EXIST
- 1. Safe Medical Alternatives Mean No Need to Declare a National HealthEmergency
- 2. Safe Medical Alternatives Can Prevent Lockdowns
- 3. Safe Medical Alternatives Mean No Need for Vaccines and Vaccine EUAs
- 4. Safe Medical Alternatives Mean No Need for Fear
- 5. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin Can Overcome COVID-19
- PART IV: THE LEGAL BASES TO SHUT DOWN THE SCAMDEMIC
- 1. Be Inspired to Action.
- 1.A. Significant Legal Victories Already Won.
- 1.B. Legal Action Intensifying
- 1.C. There is a Legal Basis to Stop the Abusive Lockdowns.
- 1.C.1. Authentic Lockdowns are Limited to 6 Months Only
- 1.C.2. Our Lockdowns Were Based on a Fake National Health Emergency
- 1.C.3. Illegal Lockdowns Can Be Challenged in 2 Ways: Litigation and/or LGU Action
- 1.C.4. Legal Basis for LGUs To Declare their Political Unit as “Lockdown-Free Zones”
- 1.C.4.a. The Local Government Code (LGC) Confers Amazing Powers to LGUs
- 1.C.4.b. The 1987 Philippine Constitution Solidly Stands Behind the LGC Powers
- 1.D. The Scamdemic House of Cards Falls Down
- 1. Be Inspired to Action.
- V. ACTION
- Stop the Lockdowns Outside by Stopping our Lockdowns Within
- Legal Action is the Strategic Action to do Now.
- 2.A. Declare lock-down free towns, cities, and/or provinces.
- 2.B. Litigate those who continue to commit crimes against humanity.
- 2.C. Activate Freedom of Information (FOIA) Requests.
- 2.D. Kind of information to include in your FOIA request
- 2.E. Undertake Other Forms of Action
The Guidebook to End Lockdowns Now is over 100 pages. It is filled with tables, figures, and scientific evidence. These provide the factual and scientific basis for all the statements and claims that are found in this Executive Summary. However, some of these references can also be found in this Executive Summary.
Most people do not have time to read a book-length Guidebook. This is why I am providing this Executive Summary. I am also releasing a PowerPoint Presentation as a companion to this Executive Summary. Both are in PDF format. I have given this presentation to hundreds of people around the country, either digitally or face-to-face.
The vast majority of participants now realize why we do not have a COVID-19 epidemic. They see that, instead, we are faced with a pre-planned scamdemic that has harmed the lives of millions. Together, this PowerPoint Presentation and the Executive Summary of why we need to and how to end the lockdowns are enough for people to take action. I sincerely hope they will.
In the near future, I will also be releasing the book-length Guidebook. Those wanting to obtain a copy of this Guidebook and/or desire further details regarding the presentation and the Executive summary can directly contact me at nperlas[at]protonmail.com.
PART I: INTRODUCTION
Guidebook for ending the unconstitutional COVID-19 lockdowns in the Philippines.This document was based on numerous consultations with doctors, lawyers, and mayors, among many others. Most of the references cited in this Guidebook, plus more than 730 evidence-based scientific … Continue reading The lockdowns and their accompanying restrictions have violated 38 provisions of the 1987 Philippine Constitution. (See below for details.)
Role of Censorship in Propping Up the Health Emergency Narrative
You will encounter amazing scientific facts in this Executive Summary that clearly show we do not have a pandemic. Therefore we do not have a health emergency. How come most do not become aware of this truth? The answer is both simple and direct.
We are living in an era of massive censorship and the corruption of all major institutions of society: from government, media, Big Pharma, and even universities and scientific journals. They are continuing the hide the truth from the people. Worse, some become pathological liars. People think it is normal for YouTube to ban over a million videos, for Facebook to censor and block millions of shares and for Twitter to delete millions of accounts for questioning the mainstream COVID-19 narrative promulgated by the World Health Organization (WHO). No one is spared. Neither you, nor me, nor some of the world’s top scientific experts on pandemics, viruses, immunologists, epidemiologists, pathologists, and even high-level government officials are spared. Who do these companies think they are? Who gave them the right to censor our thoughts?For one of the most extensive and in-depth coverages of these censorships, visit Reclaim the Net website at https://reclaimthenet.org/.
An investigative journalist from Project Veritas recently caught the technical director of CNN on video boasting that CNN used fear to get higher viewership in the TV channel. He said other networks were doing the same. Mainstream TV is no longer about objective news. It is about brainwashing to gain profits and at the same time to advance a political control agenda.
Mainstream newspapers worldwide are doing the same. They have formed the “Trusted” News Initiative (TNI). The main goal of TNI is to ignore or underplay vaccine dangers and hesitancy. Obviously, the mainstream media cannot be trusted. https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/05/13/highly-cited-covid-doctor-comes-to-a-stunning-conclusion-govt-scrubbing-unprecedented-numbers-of-injection-related-deaths/
Science in this Guidebook: Similar to What is Used to End Lockdowns Worldwide
This Guidebook is not wishful thinking. The science it contains has already independently resulted in minimizing or lifting lockdowns. Governor Gwen Garcia of Cebu Province has significantly eased the lockdown in her province based on her own scientific research on COVID-19. That research, based on local primary data, among others, independently led her to evidence-based perspectives and conclusions similar to the ones this Guidebook details below.Interview with Governor Gwen Garcia, 22 February 2021.
At least sixteen (16) states in the US have lifted their lockdownshttps://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/03/05/more-us-states-abandon-draconian-restrictions/ based on a scientific understanding of COVID-19 that is similar to the science contained in this Guidebook. For similar reasons, some countries including Sweden, Belarus, Tanzania, and Iceland did not even lockdown as others did.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/02/01/sebastian-rushworth-swedens-herd-immunity-approach-worked/; https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/02/03/no-lockdown-belarus-shows-how-herd-immunity-works/; … Continue reading They did not have to declare a national health emergency. And their society fared much better than those countries that locked down.
Why Should We Act?
We are now in the middle of an illegal medical martial law. The continued headline coverage of daily COVID-19 cases, which we now understand to be highly misleading, has sown massive fear among the people. And in this state of fear, the government has installed draconian measures and robbed people of their basic rights and freedoms as guaranteed by our constitution. The lockdowns have violated 38 provisions of the 1987 Philippine Constitution.
The lockdowns desecrate the following provisions of the Constitution: Article II, Sections 4, 5, 6, 9, 10,11,12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 23, 24, 25 27, 28; Article III, Sections 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 15, 18; Article XI, Section 1; Article XII, Section 1; Article XIII, Sections 1, 2, 3, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18; Article XIV, Section 1; Article XV, Section 3. Please read the Constitution and verify for yourself.
If you thought the lockdowns in 2020 were outrageous, what is coming in 2021 and beyond is far worst than you can ever imagine. You have no idea of what is being prepared for us.
Every aspect of our lives will be controlled: forced vaccination, vaccine passports, ID2020, total 24/7 surveillance of our lives, data tracking nanochips embedded in the entire body including our brain, AI-based data analytics, predictive analytics, and ultimately manipulative analytics. We will be herded and intimated like the citizens of China who are daily victims of the government’s “social credit” system. Goodbye, freedom. Goodbye democracy. Goodbye being truly human. https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/full/
Broad-based Resistance to Lockdowns Has Emerged
The scamdemic game is over. Millions around the world are now aware of the scam and they are holding protest rallies. Recently over a million people gathered in 100 cities and 40 countries. Last year, almost a million people in Berlin alone protested against the lockdowns.
The global resistance is not contented with mere rallies and petitions. Thousands of lawyers and doctors are now involved in legal actions versus governments around the world. The most famous of these actions is the litigation about to be filed by a group of 1,000 lawyers and over 10,000 health experts against certain scientists for crimes against humanity. These are the scientists who are at the forefront of the global covid scamdemic.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/05/15/w-h-o-and-world-leaders-must-answer-serious-questions-in-the-upcoming-trials-for-crimes-against-humanity
Despite the passivity of most people over the massive insult to their dignity, freedoms, and rights, an increasing segment of Filipinos are getting super sick and tired of the bungling, unscientific, and ineffective response by the national government to the challenge of COVID-19. They are starting to speak out and they are reaching millions. Get a glimpse of their frustrated comments on Facebook. Even members of President Duterte’s Cabinet and his IATF are starting to see the light. They are increasingly trying to balance Duterte’s unhealthy lockdown addiction. But Duterte is not listening to his own Cabinet.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/04/01/episode-2-ecq-shows-low-iq-parts-1-2/
Guidebook to Sharpen Strategic Direction and Impact of the Resistance
No amount of anger and even constructive criticism will change the mind of an administration hell-bent on pursuing a totally non-transparent agenda of control. It is totally insensitive to these expressions of anger and exasperation of citizens who have now had more than one year of life under de facto house arrest and/or wearing of ridiculous, non-proven, and health-impairing facemasks. The latter is basically training us all to be docile sheep and de facto slaves in a totalitarian government, run amok.
Now is the time to take control of our destiny, our future. For our government has betrayed our trust and confidence. It ignores scientific advice and facts. There are many paths to take. But pursuing things legally at this time is the most strategic, useful, and peaceful course to take.
This Guidebook, if widely implemented by all concerned citizens, will result in lifting the lockdowns, whether Duterte likes it or not. (See legal section below.)
Overview Summary of How We Can Stop the Lockdowns
We can stop lockdowns by doing the following.
- Understand the weakness and false claims of the existing mainstream narrative.
- Deconstruct scientifically this oppressive narrative. (See below for details)
- Demonstrate that safe medicines exist and focused protection protocols can be used.
- Use this science and existing constitutional provisions and laws to protect our health and human rights.
- Mobilize societal partnerships nationwide to lift lockdowns on the basis of these science, laws, and medical alternatives.
The Constitution and enabling laws to authorize the government to declare national health emergencies like the one we currently have on COVID-19. But, constitutionally and legally, there are three roadblocks to this total control of the lives of citizens.See Part II, III, and IV for details to support these overview statements.
First, the government can claim a national health emergency if, and only if, that claim is backed by scientific evidence. If there were no science behind the claims, then that would constitute a fake national emergency. The entire mainstream narrative will collapse. This is a fake national emergency is what we have now.
Second, if there are much safer and effective alternative medical approaches to stop the death of the vulnerable sectors of society, then, again, the health emergency measures cannot be justified. All mandatory directives are illegal. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) cannot issue an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) because we do not have a real health emergency.
Third, assuming it is real, this so-called emergency can only last 6 months. It can only continue if local government officials agree with the extension of the emergency. This limit is specified in Section 105 in the Local Government Code. The national government cannot force local chief executives to continue the lockdown if the latter will not agree.
Therefore, by mobilizing these three major facts, concerned citizens, including those in civil society, business, and government especially LGUs, can move to end the lockdowns. Barangays, towns, cities, and provinces can end the lockdowns in their respective areas if the national government continues to ignore the scientific evidence including the global experience on dealing with COVID-19, the fake pandemic.
All concerned citizens will play a key role in the future of our country. We can prevent our country from sliding towards a totalitarian Big BrotherFor those who may not aware of it yet, the term “Big Brother” comes from book, “1984”, the dystopian novel of George Orwell. In a Big Brother society, lies are promoted as truth, authorities … Continue reading society.
Part 2. SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE DEBUNKING THE “HEALTH EMERGENCY” NARRATIVE
Here is an overview of the scientific evidence showing why we do not have a health emergency. Therefore there is zero need to lockdown. In addition, the lockdowns are illegal and a huge violation of the 1987 Philippine Constitutions. Details, including the appropriate references, will be found in the full Guidebook.
The virus is not deadly.
- The natural immune systems of 99.99% of Filipinos enabled them to survive the year-long attacks of COVID-19 even before the mass vaccinations started.
- The Case Fatality Rate is low, has declined significantly for the last 9 months, and is currently hovering around 1.5% to 1.9%. We are at the tail end of the crisis.
- But even this low death figure is bloated due to fraudulent reporting.
- Many non-covid deaths were reported as COVID-19 deaths.
- There were financial incentives to report normal deaths as COVID-19 deaths.
- Despite this, there were no excess deaths from COVID-19 in 2020.
- There were 10,755 less total deaths in 2020 as compared with the average total deaths for the last five years (2015-2019).
- The total of all deaths in 2020 was 575,875. COVID-19 deaths only accounted for 8,209 (1.43%) or 19,758 (4.9%) of total deaths.There are two values for the percentage of deaths in 2020. It has to do with the way that the Philippine Statistics Authority is recording the COVID-19 deaths. In the full Guidebook, we will see why … Continue reading
- Clearly, we did not nor do we currently have an epidemic; hence no need for a national
- COVID-19 is not that deadly, especially when compared with other infectious diseases like pneumonia which, from 2015 to 2019, accounted, on average, for 56,830 deaths (9.7%) out of a total of 586,630 deaths.
- The country never locked down every time cases of pneumonia spiked up.
- Many scientists consider COVID-19 deaths on the level of seasonal flu.
- Its Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) is quite lower than flu for most ages. For those above 70 years of age, the fatality rate is slightly higher than the flu. Yet, almost 95% of those in this age group survive if proper care is given.
- The manipulative media are highlighting the existence of more infectious variants of SARS-CoV-2.
- There is nothing to fear here.
- The virus has been mutating since last year. There are hundreds of variants.
- None, so far, is deadlier than the current SARS-CoV-2 virus.
- Our immune system is more than capable of neutralizing these variants.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/04/30/new-study-t-cells-induced-by-covid-infection-can-respond-to-new-sars-cov-2-variants/ and … Continue reading
In reality, COVID-19 is a hoax, a scamdemic, a manufactured pandemic. … Continue reading
- High numbers of cases published daily are fictitious.
- Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize winner and inventor of the PCR, continuously warned that the RT-PCR test should not be used for diagnostic purposes.
- Most of the time, a positive test result does not mean one is infected.
- And to be really infected does not mean one will die from COVID-19.
- For the vast majority of time, there was no over-crowding of hospital facilities, the main excuse for the lockdown.
- Yet national government and mainstream media (MSM) persistently hyped the daily positive test numbers and framed these as infections.
- Even assuming accurate counts, reported cases of high COVID-19 cases should not be the cause for alarm and fear.
- Severe cases account for only 0.66% of all active cases.
- Most cases come from younger groups who are the least vulnerable to COVID-19.
- A vast majority of Filipinos, usually more than 99%, recover from COVID-19.
Lockdowns do not work. … Continue reading
- Scientific studies have shown no difference between countries that locked down and those who did not.
- Instead they inflict great harm on people and society.
- An increasing number of studies are giving a chilling picture of the psychological, economic and societal damage of lockdowns.
- Lockdowns are destroying the economy, throwing millions into joblessness, forcing more millions into poverty, stunting the growth and development of untold millions of children, and spurring the rise of depression and suicides.
- NEDA is now calling on the President to remove all severe lockdowns and move the country to modified general community quarantine, the lowest quarantine level.
Facemasks are ineffective and dangerous to one’s health.
- There is very little scientific evidence supporting facemasks.
- The virus is one thousand times smaller than the holes of the facemask. It can easily go in and out of the facemask. Masks do not stop the virus.
- The US CDC’s massive study on facemasks only showed a mere 1.8% benefitted from wearing the mask for 100 days.
- On the contrary, a statistical sampling of 10,000,000 million people from Denmark showed that the facemasks do not work.
- Instead, facemasks can worsen a person’s health. It can cause permanent neurological damage, among other health issues.
- CDC revealed that 86% of those who died from COVID-19 wore facemasks.
COVID-19 vaccines are super-dangerous and will not end infections and lockdownshttps://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/02/09/nicanor-perlas-the-vaccine-delusion-part-1-cbcp-pro-vaccine-decision-huge-mistake-vaccines-will-not-remove-lockdowns/
- Over half a million have already been injured. More than 10,000 have died. Yet a Harvard study estimates that these figures are only around 1% (at most 10%) of deaths and injuries from mass vaccinations.
- This means that anywhere from 100,000 to 1 million have died and the vaccines have injured 5 to 50 million.
- In the past, a death rate of 50 would result in having the vaccine pulled out from the market. Why are they still there?
- These vaccines were never approved. They are for experimental use.
- Translation: People beware. You are now the guinea pigs.
- Vaccine makers are adding insult to injury by forcing governments to pass laws to protect vaccine makers from paying people in the event of death or severe injury.
- Yet, for all their potential harm, vaccines will not remove lockdowns.
- They were never designed to remove lockdowns.
- They will not even prevent infection and transmission of the virus.
- Mass vaccinations can result in the creation of “monster” viruses, more deadly than the “relatively harmless” COVID-19 virus.
- Why vaccinate healthy people with dangerous vaccines to reduce their symptoms of sickness, if at all, from a relatively harmless virus? Do we want them to join those tens of millions that have already been injured and/or killed by the vaccines?
PART III: SAFE MEDICAL ALTERNATIVES EXIST
Safe medicines that can treat COVID-19 exist. But mainstream media and corrupt governments do not want you to know about these safe medical treatments. It will stop their social control agenda dead on its track!! In this way, they can push their mass vaccination to a much deeper agenda of control.
Safe medical alternatives mean:
- No National Health Emergency
- No Lockdowns and Overwhelmed Hospitals
- No Vaccines and Emergency Use Authorizations for Vaccines
- No Fear
1. Safe Medical Alternatives Mean No Need to Declare a National Health
Here is what the Philippine Constitution says about the authority of the state to declare national health emergencies, a declaration that, in the case of COVID-19, led to the current lockdowns.
Article VI, Section 23.2, explicitly grants the Legislative Branch of government the following authority:
“In times of war or other national emergency, the Congress may, by law, authorize the President, for a limited period and subject to such restrictions as it may prescribe, to exercise powers necessary and proper to carry out a declared national policy. Unless sooner withdrawn by resolution of the Congress, such powers shall cease upon the next
adjournment thereof.” [Emphasis added.]
Bayanihan One, the COVID-19 emergency laws, (R.A. 114940) explicitly cites this provision of the Constitution as the basis of enacting the national health emergency. To justify the existence of a national health emergency, Congress cites the following: “the rise of confirmed cases of COVID-19” and the continuing “serious threat to … lives”.
However, as we have seen in Part II of this Guidebook, the rise of the so-called confirmed cases are mostly artifacts of misleading high cycle thresholds of RT-PCR tests. Test positives are not confirmed infected cases. In addition, the continuing “serious threat” expectation did not materialize. Our death rates are at the level of a relatively harmless flu and have stabilized at a very low CFR and IFR levels.
Now, on top of this, add the existence of safe alternatives (see discussion below) that can further dramatically bring down both infection numbers and death rates. Thus, the two major reasons for a national health emergency evaporate into thin air.
2. Safe Medical Alternatives Can Prevent Lockdowns
What is the point of a lockdown when those who are potentially susceptible or have early symptoms (maybe) of COVID-19 can be treated safely? The entire purpose of lockdowns is to avoid hospitals from being overwhelmed. That was how it was explained to all of us. Now, if we have these potential safe medicines in our hands, then the hospitals will not be overwhelmed. As a consequence, we do not need to lockdown.
3. Safe Medical Alternatives Mean No Need for Vaccines and Vaccine EUAs
Government regulators justify the issuance of all Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for vaccines on the existence of a national health emergency. Here is a typical EUA justification from the US FDA:
“The Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) has declared a public health emergency that justifies the emergency use of drugs and biological products during the COVID-19 pandemic. In response, FDA has issued an EUA for the unapproved product, Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, for active immunization against COVID-19 in individuals 16 years of age and older.”https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/02/09/nicanor-perlas-the-vaccine-delusion-part-1-cbcp-pro-vaccine-decision-huge-mistake-vaccines-will-not-remove-lockdowns/[Emphasis added.]
Furthermore, both Philippine and US laws require that no safe alternative treatment for whatever disease, including COVID-19, exists. If it does, as we shall see below, then EUAs cannot be given.
Based on all the science presented in Part II, there is no national health emergency. Instead we have a pandemic of false tests that we consciously imposed on humanity. All EUAs are illegal.
4. Safe Medical Alternatives Mean No Need for Fear
We have seen from Part II above that there is no need to fear anything for the following reasons:
- COVID-19 is a relatively harmless virus.
- So 99.99% of Filipinos have survived the virus.
- The death rate (Infection Fatality Rate) is at the level of the common flu.
- There were no excess deaths in 2020 due to COVID-19.
Now, on top of all these reasons, introduce the existence of safe and effective medical treatments for those, who by their age or weakened immune system are susceptible to COVID-19. Then there is no basis for fear to remain in us. The science is clear. COVID- 19 is a relatively harmless virus which danger has been overhyped by fear-mongering government officials and quad media.
5. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin Can Overcome COVID-19
There are two safe and effective treatments for COVID-19 especially as prophylaxis (prevention) and dealing with early onset of symptoms. These are Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Ivermectin.
Covid Call to Humanity has published fairly long articles pointing to the value of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Ivermectin for dealing with COVID-19.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2020/09/21/hydroxychloroquine-can-dramatically-ease-the-covid-19-crisis/ I would like to invite readers to take a close look at these articles and familiarize themselves with it. Now, just some key points regarding both medications.
Dr. Risch is a highly respected medical scientist with dozens of peer-reviewed articles published in the mainstream journals of medicine. He is no quack doctor and his scientific writings are more than difficult to rebut.
He says that some doctors he knew have saved hundreds of lives using HCQ, but are now in danger of losing their licenses. At some point, he said that thousands of lives could have been saved with the proper use of HCQ.
Dr. Risch has personally done 7 scientific studies which showed the effectiveness of HCQ. Four studies involved a total of almost 500 high-risk patients. There were no deaths. There was also a controlled trial of more than 700 high-risk patients in Brazil. The study showed a reduced risk of hospitalization with two deaths among those treated with HCQ. The Brazilian study had 398 matched patients in France which showed that HCQ reduced the risk of hospitalization.
In June 2020, a group of Ph.D. researchers and scientists established the C19study website to collate new studies about COVID-19, with a particular focus on HCQ use. As of writing, the website has catalogued 103 articles, each one categorized based on the stage at which HCQ was used for treatment.
According to this meta-analysis, in studies where HCQ was used as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), post exposure prophylaxis (PEP), and as early treatment, the medication proved to be effective. HCQ use as late treatment (for example, in treatment of those who are already exhibiting severe symptoms) showed mixed results. This latter result shows the importance of using HCQ properly.
That HCQ is effective in very large-scale uses, in conjunction with other approaches, is demonstrated by India, where 99% of its people have recovered despite a very high caseload.
We know this from an article about how the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) utilized treatments using medicines and certified regimens for every stage of the COVID-19 disease. This, they say, “is a masterstroke that none of the foreign agencies…have been able to deliver”.
Unlike in other countries, India ramped up health infrastructures and relied on primary care clinics to aggressively treat those showing symptoms of the disease using the prescribed protocols. India also instituted protocols so that asymptomatic and mild cases could be treated at home while moderate and severe cases were treated in hospitals. For early treatment, India relied on Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Ivermectin. The two drugs were made available in pharmacies, and were also easily accessible in government health centers.
It may seem from the slanted news coming from mainstream media that India is suffering from an increase in infections. The story is not as simple and stark as it is being presented. We offer an alternative picture of what is going on in India. We untangle the web of lies behind India’s current surge in covid cases. See the detailed research at https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/05/15/untangling-the-web-of-lies-surrounding-indias-latest-covid-surge/.
Ivermectin, another anti-covid medicine, has come to the forefront in recent weeks as the most effective treatment for COVID-19. Many scientists around the world are advocating the use of Ivermectin as an effective medicine to stop the advance of COVID-19 especially if used as a prophylactic or in the early stages of disease onset when mild symptoms start to appear.
Allan Ladrito M.D. is the leading advocate and user of Ivermectin in the Philippines. He has successfully treated over 8000 COVID-19 patients in the past year. He is not aware of any deaths resulting from this treatment. Instead, he has received a lot of positive feedback regarding the amazing recoveries of patients using his Ivermectin protocol. Dr. Landrito has been in the news in the past weeks as government agencies, legislators, businessmen, and doctors debate over the urgent need to have Ivermectin widely available to the general public.
Here is a very short explanation of the six ways Ivermectin knocks down COVID-19.Six Mechanisms of Action How IVERMECTIN Knocks Down COVID-19. Notes from a personal conversation with Dr. Allan Ladrito.
Ivermectin stops the penetration of the virus inside the cells of the host. Second, Ivermectin interferes with the stealth attack on the nucleus by the virus if the latter is able to penetrate the cell. Third, the drug inhibits the activity of an enzyme that enables the virus to replicate. Fourth, Ivermectin stops the rapid proliferation of the virus, a rapid growth that can lead to a “cytokine storm”, an over-activity of the immune system. Fifth, Ivermectin inhibits the stimulation of cell receptors responsible for the hyper-coagulation of blood (blood clots). Finally, Ivermectin enhances interferon production and effectiveness. Interferon is important in immune defense.
Only its incredible safety record matches the amazing range of therapeutic action by Ivermectin. Humans have used over three billion pills of Ivermectin since its invention. Yet there are no reported deaths due to Ivermectin. No wonder Ivermectin belongs to WHO’s list of essential drugs.https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-who-data-ivermectin-reduces-covid-mortality-by-81-alsowho-we-still-dont-recommend-it
PART IV: THE LEGAL BASES TO SHUT DOWN THE SCAMDEMIC
We have brought all the above scientific facts to the legal authorities. They chose to ignore it. Instead, they mouth “whole of nation” participatory approaches and do not implement them. They cite constitutional provisions regarding their authority yet ignore other constitutional provisions that hold the absolute power of the national government within certain limits. In addition, they have wantonly and massively violated 38 sections of the Constitution.
They are not interested in constructive appeals to reason and critical support. We can no longer appeal to scientific facts and global experience to show the lockdowns do not work. Now we have to use legal means to end the lockdowns.
This is how we all can legally remove the lockdowns. Local governments, civil society, and concerned businesses can come together to forge a constitutionally valid force to lift the lockdowns and free society from medical martial law. We have the law behind us and the national government cannot stop this legal force!
1. Be Inspired to Action.
1.A. Significant Legal Victories Already Won.
Around the world, astute citizens and honest government leaders have won significant legal victories.
- stopped lockdowns;https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/04/05/finland-withdraws-covid-lockdown-after-it-was-deemed-unconstitutional/ … Continue reading
- removed facemask mandates;https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/04/15/weimar-court-no-more-masks-tests-and-distancing-for-students
- branded RT-PCT tests as unreliable and unlawful;https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2020/11/25/portugese-court-rules-pcr-tests-as-unreliable-and-unlawful-to-quarantine-people/
- struck down quarantine measures;https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/04/17/reykjavik-court-rules-it-is-illegal-to-mandate-people-to-stay-at-quarantine-hotels/
- enabled religious congregations to have face-to-face events;https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/04/23/supreme-court-says-california-cannot-restrict-religious-household-gatherings/; … Continue reading
- opened schools;https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/04/15/weimar-court-no-more-masks-tests-and-distancing-for-students/
- ordered the hospital to use ivermectin;https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/03/31/judge-orders-hospital-to-use-ivermectin-covid-patient-80-year-old-woman-recovers/ and
- declared covid fines against protesters as unconstitutional.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/04/05/covid-fines-against-israeli-protesters-unconstitutional/
1.B. Legal Action Intensifying
In addition to legal victories, there are many legal battles being fought along with similar issues that other citizens have already won. Furthermore, there are new cases that promise to change the legal landscape of lockdowns and its collateral draconian measures.
Here are some on-going legal cases to:
- abolish mandatory vaccinations;https://childrenshealthdefense.org/child-health-topics/righting-wrongs/legal-challenge-against-public-health-emergency-filed-today-in-new-york-city/; … Continue reading
- do away with green pass (vaccine passport);https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/04/15/israelis-file-lawsuit-to-abolish-the-green-pass/
- seek damages for adverse effects of AstraZeneca;https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/03/22/italian-prosecutors-launch-manslaughter-investigation-case-against-astrazeneca/
- establish false reporting by fact-checkers;https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2020/12/07/german-doctor-files-lawsuit-against-fact-checkers/and
- end restrictions on hydroxychloroquine.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2020/08/31/aaps-sues-fda-to-end-its-restrictions-on-hydroxychloroquine/
The most significant of all cases is going to be the case of Israeli citizens against their government. The citizens are demanding the government to remove their mandatory vaccination program. They went to the International Criminal Court (ICC) and filed a case against the Israeli government for crimes against humanity.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/03/24/israeli-jews-file-petition-to-international-criminal-court-says-israels-mandatory-vaccination-violates-nuremberg-code/
If they win this case, this would be the end of all vaccine mandates around the world. Citizens from other countries will definitely sue their governments for any such vaccine mandates. After a positive outcome for the Israeli litigation, no politician would risk his/her political career by finding themselves before the ICC court in Hague defending themselves against charges of crimes against humanity.
1.C. There is a Legal Basis to Stop the Abusive Lockdowns.
Congress used the Philippine constitution as its basis for authorizing the President of the Philippines to declare a national health emergency. We have to know this because this, at the same time, shows the total impotence of the national government to keep on imposing the lockdowns.
1.C.1. Authentic Lockdowns are Limited to 6 Months Only
Article VI, Section 23.2, explicitly grants the Legislative Branch of government the following authority: “In times of war or other national emergency, the Congress may, by law, authorize the President, for a limited period and subject to such restrictions as it may prescribe, to exercise powers necessary and proper to carry out a declared national policy. Unless sooner withdrawn by resolution of the Congress, such powers shall cease upon the next adjournment thereof.” [Emphasis added.]
1.C.2. Our Lockdowns Were Based on a Fake National Health Emergency
As we have seen in Part II, the facts show there is no national health emergency.
- We have low death rates.
- We have no excess deaths.
- We have no epidemic.
- The infection cases are bogus, the by-product of highly misleading RT-PCR tests.
- Effective safe treatments exist.
1.C.3. Illegal Lockdowns Can Be Challenged in 2 Ways: Litigation and/or LGU Action
Current lockdowns are Illegal on two counts. We do not have a national health emergency. And these illegal lockdowns have exceeded their statutory basis of 6 months.
Therefore there are two ways to stop these continuing illegal lockdowns.
First one can file a lawsuit against the appropriate government agency. This first possibility is currently being explored by a group of lawyers, researchers, and medical doctors. We cannot discuss the basis and timing of this litigation in this document geared for the public.
Second, we can encourage Local Government Units (LGU) at both the provincial and/or the town/city level to voluntarily lift the lockdowns in their area of responsibilities. We can achieve this either through litigation or the voluntary and free decision of an LGU to unilaterally lift the lockdown. The LGU can make this decision on the basis of the facts, the data, and the science.
Let us focus on the second option for LGUs. This option is the simplest and most direct solution to the lockdown.
1.C.4. Legal Basis for LGUs To Declare their Political Unit as “Lockdown-Free Zones”
In conversations with mayors and a governor, all were not aware that they had the power to go against the directives and dictates of the national government. Many do not believe in the lockdowns as evidenced by the very low death rates in their province, cities, or towns. But they all felt they could not do anything about national dictates. The eyes of these mayors and governor began to light up when they understood that even the President of the Philippines could not do anything should they decide to lift the lockdown in their province, city, or town.
1.C.4.a. The Local Government Code (LGC) Confers Amazing Powers to LGUs
Earlier we saw that Article VI, Section 23.2 of the Philippine Constitution limits the emergency powers of the President to 6 months. The law that exactly defines this limit to the powers of the President during times of national health emergencies (assuming the latter is real) is the Local Government Code of the Philippines or R.A. 7160 or the LGC, for short.
What happens after the expiry of this period? Title Five – Local Health Boards, Section 105 of the LGC gives the answer. It says:
“Direct National Supervision and Control by the Secretary of Health. – In cases of epidemics, pestilence, and other widespread public health dangers, the Secretary of Health may, upon the direction of the President and in consultation with the local government unit concerned, temporarily assume direct supervision and control over health operations in any local government unit for the duration of the emergency, but in no case exceeding a cumulative period of six (6) months. With the concurrence of the local government unit concerned, the period for such direct national control and supervision may be further extended.” [Emphasis added.]
This is clear as day. If the President wants to continue the lockdowns beyond 6 months on the purported basis of a national “health emergency” (that does not exist), then he will have to get the consent of the LGU involved!
In this process, there can be disagreements between the national government and the LGU regarding any local action by the LGU with regard to any health emergency. In such a case, the LGC is very clear as to which perspective will be legally upheld.
In BOOK I, GENERAL PROVISIONS, TITLE ONE. – BASIC PRINCIPLES CHAPTER 1. – THE CODE, POLICY AND APPLICATION, SECTION 5. Rules of Interpretation, the LGC states:
“(a) Any provision on a power of a local government unit shall be liberally interpreted in its favor, and in case of doubt, any question thereon shall be resolved in favor of devolution of powers and of the lower local government unit. Any fair and reasonable doubt as to the existence of the power shall be interpreted in favor of the local government unit concerned;” [Emphasis added.]
Note that Section 5 (a) mentions twice in this short paragraph, that in the event of any doubt about “any provision on a power” of the LGU shall be “liberally interpreted” in the favor of the LGU. Likewise, any “fair and reasonable doubt as to the existence of the power” shall be decided in the favor of the LGU.
This Section 5 also has this very important provision:
“(c) The general welfare provisions in this Code shall be liberally interpreted to give more powers to local government units in accelerating economic development and upgrading the quality of life for the people in the community;” [Emphasis added.]
Section 5 (c) demonstrates the vast powers devolved to LGUs. First, this provision reinforces again the powers of the LGU under Section 5 (a) above. Second, should there be any remaining doubts to the interpretation of the powers of the LGU, this Section 5 (c) plainly states that the general welfare provisions of the LGC will be “liberally interpreted” in favor of LGUs.
The vast powers contained in Section 5 (c) can be understood more thoroughly if we take a closer look at the “general welfare” provisions of the LGC. This general welfare provision is found in Chapter 2 of the LGC, which spells out the general powers and attributes of LGUs.
This is what Section 16 of CHAPTER 2, stipulates:
“SECTION 16. General Welfare. – Every local government unit shall exercise the powers expressly granted, those necessarily implied there from, as well as powers necessary, appropriate, or incidental for its efficient and effective governance, and those which are essential to the promotion of the general welfare. Within their respective territorial jurisdictions, local government units shall ensure and support, among other things, the preservation and enrichment of culture, promote health and safety, enhance the right of the people to a balanced ecology, encourage and support the development of appropriate and self-reliant scientific and technological capabilities, improve public morals, enhance economic prosperity and social justice, promote full employment among their residents, maintain peace and order, and preserve the comfort and convenience of their inhabitants. [Emphasis added.]
This is a mind-blowing provision of the LGC. These are very broad and comprehensive powers that the LGC gives to LGUs. Look at the words emphasized in “bold” letters above. The powers granted are those powers that are “expressly granted” or clearly stated. In addition, the LGUs are granted powers that are “implied therefrom” plus other powers “necessary” for its “effective governance” and “essential to the promotion of the general welfare”.
1.C.4.b. The 1987 Philippine Constitution Solidly Stands Behind the LGC Powers
Why did our legislators create such a wide-ranging transfer of power to LGUs? It is as if LGUs were like States unto themselves, like States in a Federal form of government as in the United States of America.
We find the answer in our 1987 Philippine Constitution. In 1986, the Philippines had just liberated itself from 14 violent and destructive years of martial law under Ferdinand Marcos that started in September 1972. The framers of the 1987 constitution wanted to make sure that the Philippines was never subjugated again under any form of martial law.
Thus we find various provisions in the Constitution that prevent the totalitarian takeover of Philippine society again. Some of these provisions are:
Article II, Section 25 of the Philippine Constitution that proclaims:
“The State shall ensure the autonomy of local governments.” [Emphasis added.]
There is also Article X, Section 3 of the Constitution:
“The Congress shall enact a local government code which shall provide for a more responsive and accountable local government structure instituted through a system of decentralization with effective mechanisms of recall, initiative, and referendum, allocate among the different local government units their powers, responsibilities, and resources, and provide for the qualifications, election, appointment, and removal, term, salaries, powers and functions and duties of local officials, and all other matters relating to the organization and operation of the local units.” [Emphasis added.]
The Local Government Code (LGC) in 1991 is the translation of this intent to radically decentralize the governance of the Philippines. The LGC thus contains this language in Section 2 as follows:
“SECTION 2. Declaration of Policy. – (a) It is hereby declared the policy of the State that the territorial and political subdivisions of the State shall enjoy genuine and meaningful local autonomy to enable them to attain their fullest development as self-reliant communities and make them more effective partners in the attainment of national goals. Toward this end, the State shall provide for a more responsive and accountable local government structure instituted through a system of decentralization whereby local government units shall be given more powers, authority, responsibilities, and resources. The process of decentralization shall proceed from the national government to the local government units.” [Emphasis added.]
Obviously, the LGU cannot have “genuine and meaningful local autonomy” if it is totally and/or continually subservient to the national government. That is why the LGC has a long Section 3 that spells out the “operative principles of decentralization”.
In summary, it is clear. LGUs have the power to lift lockdowns if they so wish. This is strongly and widely supported in both the Local Government Code that is the enabling legislation that brings to reality the broad intent of the Constitution. Thus, if an LGU recognizes, through data, science, and reason, that the Philippines is not in the middle of an epidemic and decides to lift the lockdown in its area of responsibility, then the national government has no power to stop it. If LGUs truly understood this, then lockdowns throughout the country will slowly but surely be removed, starting from those LGUs that barely experienced the effects of the “relatively harmless” COVID-19 virus.
In this way, lockdown-free zones will sprout all over the country. Even heavily brainwashed mayors of NCR will ultimately get it too. For we do not have an epidemic and there are safe ways for protecting the vulnerable from a relatively harmless virus whose death is basically similar to the common flu that comes and goes every year.
1.D. The Scamdemic House of Cards Falls Down
The lockdowns brought with it all kinds of illegal directives and measures: closing of schools, banning of religious gatherings, QR codes for contact tracing, wearing of masks, social distancing, mandatory vaccination, vaccine passports, and other dubious unscientific practices. These have very little to do with health and truthful science. These outrageous measures had more to do with absolute power and control and the creation of a totalitarian state.
Fortunately for all of us, such decadent aspirations are built on a house of cards. They all assume that the lockdowns are health giving and legal. We have clearly shown that these lockdowns are unscientific, illegal and harmful. Once we have won the victory on lockdowns, it will be easy to win the victory on all these other issues.
However, in addition, to bring up the legal basis for lockdowns, we need to also briefly cite the constitutional basis for questioning all the other collateral practices that have and are causing huge damage to Philippine society.
1.D.1. Yes, Dear Parents, We Can Legally Open Schools Again
One of the most horrifying effects of the lockdowns is the closing of schools. With these millions of children pre-teens, teenagers, and young adults lost their rights to education. Not only have their rights been abused, they were also subjected to physical, psychological, moral, and spiritual aberrations. These scars will accompany them throughout their degraded lives. Closing of schools are crimes against humanity. Here are legal handles specific to education that can help in opening schools.
Article XIV, Section 1 of the Philippine Constitute provides:
“The State shall protect and promote the right of all citizens to quality education at all levels and shall take appropriate steps to make such education accessible to all.” [Emphasis added.]
Throughout the lockdowns, the government has done the total opposite to its constitutional duties and obligations.
How do you promote “quality” education when you force students to stay home and use digital schooling instead? Facebook is saturated with complaints regarding the impracticality of digital education.
How do you make education “accessible to all” when the government is fostering digital apartheid? They are dividing the students into two: those who have the means and the technology and those who do not have either.
Article XV, Section 3.2. of our Constitution stipulates:
“The right of children to assistance, including proper care and nutrition, and special protection from all forms of neglect, abuse, cruelty, exploitation, and other conditions prejudicial to their development;”
The closing of schools due to lockdown is a perfect means of fostering “neglect”, “abuse”, “cruelty” and “other conditions prejudicial to their development.
Children are neglected with their education is put on hold. They are abused when they are forced to wear masks and stay mostly indoors when the scientific evidence is clear that children are the least affected by COVID-19. It is cruelty when children are subjected to abuse and cruelty on a daily basis. It is cruel when children do not get the hugs and other gestures of care that are so important for their mental and emotional health.https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2020/07/21/expert-panel-recommends-reopening-of-schools-for-young-children-and-children-with-special-needs/ and … Continue reading
Stopping education also stunts the physical, emotional, intellectual, moral, and existential intelligence of the children. These are, therefore, prejudicial to their development as human beings.
1.D.2. The State cannot interfere with religious gatherings and worship
Article II, Section 6
“The separation of Church and State shall be inviolable.”
In the Bill of Rights of the Constitution, Article III, Section 5
“No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil or political rights.” [Emphasis added.]
1.D.3 Facemasks and Social Distancing violate the Constitution
Article II, Section 11 of the Constitution states:
“The State values the dignity of every human person and guarantees full respect for human rights.”
There is no respect for human rights when one is forced to cower in fear for which the facemask is the symbol of submission to an outside illegal power. Furthermore, facemasks do not work and are basically useless except when they “bless” you with illness. (See discussion above in Part II)
Article II, Section 15
“The State shall protect and promote the right to health of the people and instill health consciousness among them.” [Emphasis added.]
Facemasks do not promote health. It damages one’s health. False news or disinformation that comes with the lockdowns induces fear. Fear creates stress and weakens the immune system. A weakened immune system makes one more vulnerable to the virus and to other illnesses.
Instead of promoting the tremendous health-protective value of the human immune system, the national government promotes unproven vaccines that are now killing tens of thousands and harming millions worldwide.
1.D.4. QR Codes and Contact Tracing are Illegal
The Constitution explicitly states in the Bill of Rights (Article III) as follows:
“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures of whatever nature and for any purpose shall be inviolable …”
The privacy of communication and correspondence shall be inviolable except upon lawful order of the court, or when public safety or order requires otherwise as prescribed by law.
These two sections clearly defend our Rights to Privacy. QR Codes used on contact tracing clearly violate these two sections of the Constitution. The moment you use these QR Codes, you are basically giving the app controller your 24/7 geolocation, among others. It is really spooky to get the feeling that an unknown person is now stalking you 24/7. In addition, downloading these apps can make you vulnerable to other forms of data leaks coming from your smartphone.
Furthermore, Section 2 protects people from unjustified restraint. When you enter an establishment, say a supermarket or an airport, and they ask for your QR Code, in effect, they are restraining your right of participation and movement. They are practicing a form of “unreasonable searches and seizures”. You are no longer secure in your person when these forms of unjustified restraint are forced on you.
The science is clear. There is no national health emergency that justifies the lockdowns and all the repressive measures that come with it. We can now take the necessary actions to stop the lockdowns. The first step of the journey begins within.
Stop the Lockdowns Outside by Stopping our Lockdowns Within
We need to understand that months of lockdown have created an automatic lockdown psyche inside us. We are now predisposed to behave in lockdown mode by force of unthinking habit. Before we dare to remove the lockdown in society, we need to banish our psychological lockdowns. What is inside us ultimately surrounds us as our external
We stop the lockdowns within by doing the following.
- Conquer Our Fear
- Take Care of Our Immune System
- Unleash the Power of Our Creative Thinking
- Seek The Truth
- Search Websites that Are Trust Worthy
- Become an Active Researcher
- Practice Pre-Figuration
An elaboration of the details in these steps can be found in this article I wrote about this. “END THE LOCKDOWNS! Stop It Outside By Ending the Lockdowns Inside Us”.
Pre-figuration is new for many. So I want to say a few words about it. Pre-figuration means to practice the future that we want, today! We are creating our future with our actions today. Here are some examples.
- Do not Wear Face Masks at Home. It makes no sense as we have seen above.
- Practice Social Closeness in Home-Based Activities. Hug those you love.
- Boycott Abusive Big Tech. Support Alternative Apps that do not censor.
These are aspects of the future we want to happen. By doing this now, we are practicing to be in that future now, today. We thus prepare our existence in the future world we want by living that reality today.
Legal Action is the Strategic Action to do Now.
As we have seen, all appeals to reason and science have fallen on deaf ears. Instead, abusive irrationality continues and the vaccine deaths and injuries continue by the thousands and our economy continue to suffer recession.
When we are ready, we can take legal action. There are two kinds of legal action. We have already seen above the scientific, medical, and legal bases for these actions.
2.A. Declare lock-down free towns, cities, and/or provinces.
This would be the fastest and easiest thing to accomplish. All one would have to do is to convince the local chief executive (mayors or governors) of two things: a) the science is demonstrating that there is no epidemic, and b) they have the legal power not to follow forced national directives. Instead, they can declare their towns, cities, or provinces as lockdown-free areas.
2.B. Litigate those who continue to commit crimes against humanity.
The national government has violated 38 provisions of the Constitution. In the process, they are destroying the lives and livelihood of millions.
They are also violating the Nuremberg Code that explicitly prevents medical experimentation on humans. Rolling out untested and unapproved vaccines that are now harming and killing millions around the world, including the Philippines, is a clear violation of the Nuremberg Code. These government officials are committing crimes against humanity.
Litigation is more complicated than creating lockdown-free areas. Careful legal preparation is necessary.
2.C. Activate Freedom of Information (FOIA) Requests.
In any legal action, you need facts. Therefore, for your local action, get local data from DOH and/or the LGU and/or the Local Health Board and/or the local IATF or the Municipal or City IATF (MIATF). Our Constitution and our laws have empowered us to do this through the passage of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).
Here is what you can do.
- Determine who in the LGU is the repository of COVID-related data. One or more institutions may be involved.
- Write a formal letter to all the heads of the identified institutions in your local area.
- Make sure you have an authorized recipient of your formal request letter sign “Received” in your copy of the letters. You will need this document for follow-ups.
- If they refuse, write a second letter reminding them of their constitutional and legal obligations to release the information to you. They are required by law to do this.
- By law, the LGU agency has a maximum of 15 days to respond to your letter. If their response is unsatisfactory (that is, they do not release the data), then write them again asking why they are not releasing the data.
- If they ultimately do not release the data, you can sue them before the Ombudsman. Any citizen can complain to the Ombudsman. No one needs to be a lawyer and have the services of a lawyer.
- If you are not sure of what to do, kindly contact me at nperlas[at]protonmail.com. A team of qualified volunteers will help you out.
2.D. Kind of information to include in your FOIA request
The information to request under FOIA can be simple or extensive. We will start with the minimum information to request. We will only discuss more extensive requests in the future, if necessary.
Request the following information.
- Models/Brands of RT-PCR tests used
- Cycle Threshold (CT) used by all DOH and private testing centers for the RTPCR tests broken down on a weekly basis
- Number of tests done on a weekly basis
- Number of test positives reported weekly
- Number of “test positives” that are symptomatic among test positives
- Number of active cases
- Number of recovered cases
- Total Deaths from Covid
See Appendix A for a sample of the FOIA request.
2.E. Undertake Other Forms of Action
Other forms of actions can emanate from this simple yet very profound important advice of Christ: “You shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you Free.”The Bible. The New Testament. John 8:32
If we know the Truth, we will be freed from fear. If we know the Truth, we can find creative ways of stopping the lockdown.
2.E.1 Spread the Truth of Scientific Information as Widely as Possible
The most important other action one can undertake aside from legal action is to spread scientific information about COVID-19. There are many different ways of doing this.
- Translate solid scientific facts into the different dialects so the poorer sections of society will have access to the Truth.
- Use all kinds of digital means to spread the information, especially in alternative social media. Remember mainstream media is corrupt and is compromised. They mostly spread disinformation and fear.
- Mobilize the scientific facts to inform one’s family, friends, community, and networks. We live in a highly censored and orchestrated world of disinformation and control. The only way to break through this constructed illusory world is to share the real scientific facts as widely as possible.
- Conduct seminars and workshops for the public if one feels he/she has the competence to do so.
- Guest in radio talk shows to spread the message.
Ultimately, when others have the information and they are inspired to act from that information, they will think of many other possible different ways to stop the scamdemic.
2.E.2 Strengthen Your Inner Condition and Prefigure the Future You Want
We discussed these action steps above in V.1. Take a deeper look at this. Most importantly, find courage, strengthen your immune system and prefigure or practice the future today.
When you do not wear masks in public, you prefigure the future today. When you do not social distance, you are bringing a future reality now. You can do the opposite with the other ridiculous mandates that have no scientific evidence behind them. Besides we do not have an epidemic. We stop the scamdemic if we do not agree to follow the arbitrary rules of the lockdowns that have never been proven to work.
Let us not participate in a societal lie, a farce. That is not our destiny. Nor is being docile before abusive authorities the purpose of our existence.
When we free ourselves within, we develop the predisposition and the capacity to free ourselves externally. The power for freedom will be continuously nurtured, waiting for the time that this freedom will find an opportunity to manifest itself and create a real new normal worthy of our dignity as human beings.
Governments will be affected by this inner determination and the small actions that energize it. They cannot escape it.
Let us keep the embers of our Spirit burning. When the proper time comes, let these embers conflagrate into a massive fire that will purify the COVID-19 illusions and transform the structures that hysterically defend these illusions at all costs.
It is time to throw off our chains of fear and apathy. Let us reclaim our lives, our freedoms, and our humanity. End our self-imposed lockdown inside ourselves to create the solid foundation to end the lockdown outside in society!!! Science and the law are with us.
As Jose Rizal rightly observed in his time: “There are no tyrants, if there are no slaves”, especially fearful and willing ones.
The future will be what we fight for. Let us go do it. There is no time to waste!