In a March 12, 2022 article published in Manila Bulletin, Agence France-Presse reported that World Health Organization (WHO) voiced its frustration at people marking the second anniversary of March 11, 2020, insisting that the real alarm came six weeks earlier — but few people bothered to sit up and take notice.
According to the report, the WHO declared a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) — the highest level of alarm in the global health regulations — on January 30, 2020, when fewer than 100 cases outside of China had no deaths had been reported. But it was only when WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus described the worsening situation as a pandemic on March 11 that many countries seemed to wake up to the danger.
March 11 marks two years since the World Health Organization first described Covid-19 as a pandemic, shaking countries into action as the disease ripped around the planet. The once-in-a-century pandemic has turned the world upside down, claiming over 6 million lives and infecting at least 450 million people.
Editor’s Note: We could understand the frustration of the WHO officials when no one heeded their first alarm on January 30, 2020. However, we also know the strategy they had employed that people noticed, and hysteria followed.
Marking this two years after the pandemic alarm, where and in what state is the world in?
We have 10 points here to ponder:
- What if WHO had not changed the definition of pandemic? Is COVID-19 considered as one? [See Why the WHO cannot be trusted.]
- What if the world followed the Great Barrington Declaration? Are we as progressive as Sweden? [See The Great Barrington Declaration: Life must return to normal for the healthy, the vulnerable must be protected; Sweden: The Disaster That Never Came].
- Could the world be this disastrous without fear-mongering of mainstream media, scientific data censorship, and gagging of concerned experts [see Trusted News Initiative or Corrupted News Initiative? Mission: Systematic censorship of the world’s top public health experts; CNN technical director admits network used fear in COVID coverage to drive ratings up; Media Outlets Scramble to Point Fingers Before COVID Fiasco is Fully Dismantled; The Pandemic of Censorship].
- What if the big tech and social media did not employ fact-checking and censorship? Could the truth be out in the open for the public to see? [See Facebook Insider: Censorship in Social Media is Real; YouTube expands censorship, will ban ALL anti-vaccine content.]
- Suppose the governments allowed early treatment protocols and repurposed low-priced drugs. Do we have covid deaths as high as six million as covid proponents want us to believe? [See Dr. Peter McCullough: Successful early treatment for COVID makes vaccines unnecessary; How ivermectin prevents COVID 19 and possibly protects the unvaccinated from toxic spike proteins being shed by the vaccinated; Hydroxychloroquine can dramatically ease the COVID-19 crisis.]
- If the Health authorities follow WHO’s and other experts’ warnings against Remdesivir, do we have six million deaths? [See WHO advises against use of remdesevir for COVID patients; New study: WHO data shows Remdesevir causes serious bradycardia among COVID-19 patients; Dr. Bryan Ardis: Remdesivir is the Real Cause of COVID Deaths; The truth about COVID deaths is a coming out.]
- If we only test symptomatic individuals, do we have 450 million infected with covid? [See Asymptomatic people do not spread COVID-19; WHO: Asymptomatics aren’t driving the spread of the coronavirus; RT-PCR Cannot Differentiate Covid-19 and Seasonal Influenza: What Do We Have Then?; How COVID Testing Strategy Will Extend Pandemic Scare.]
- And if authorities acknowledged the safety and efficacy of repurposed drugs like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, would the covid vaccines be authorized for emergency use? [See India’s Uttar Pradesh moving towards being covid-free, Ivermectin central to virus control; Hydroxychloroquine: Uganda’s secret weapon against COVID-19; VigiAccess Data Shows COVID Vaccines More Dangerous than Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine.]
- Suppose the governments did not allow the vaccine manufacturers immunity from liability. Could we be seeing the dismantling of Big Pharma as early as 2021? [See Leaked Pfizer contracts show they knew of adverse effects and lack of long-term efficacy of vaccines; No legal recourse, compensation for vaccine injuries; Pfizer Controls Health Policy of 110 Countries, CCH Challenges the Duterte Government to Make Public Its Contract with Pfizer].
- Could the purported pandemic stretch this far if people did not succumb to fear followed by Stockholm syndrome? [See Fear appeal: The science of using fear to manipulate people into submission; Naked Fear Appeal. Do not be Fooled. Don’t Yield. Don’t Get Vaccinated; Public Seminar 25: What Is Stockholm Syndrome?; Faulty COVID-19 tests: Why prisoners love their jailers and never-ending lockdowns; Are Filipinos Being Subjected to Mass Behavioral Experiments?]
Undoubtedly, the pandemic orchestrators want people to be compliant and obedient. People’s complacency and dependence on the government’s policies will lead to prolonged ‘health emergency.’ We, the people, have the power to change this course. We have enough, and two years are already adequate to stand up and stand firm! Because the next thing we will know, WHO has the power over our nations, once it’s approved and signed, a new WHO treaty will bypass our constitutions [see https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/2022/03/pandemic-treaty/45591/].
Read Original Article
Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.
Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.