Covid teams can vaccinate pupils against parents’ wishes, schools told
New guidelines from the UK government say that healthcare staff can decide whether children get a COVID vaccine against the wishes of their parents. A report on this was written by Richard Adams and published by The Guardian last September 15, 2021.
According to the new guidelines, “If a parent objects to their child being vaccinated but the child wants to be vaccinated and is judged to be Gillick competent, the healthcare professional will try to reach agreement between the parent and child. However, the parent cannot overrule the decision of a Gillick competent child”.
The National Health Service (NHS) states that the Gillick competence can be applied to children below 16, who “can consent to their own treatment if they’re believed to have enough intelligence, competence and understanding to fully appreciate what’s involved in their treatment”.
Editor’s Note: A similar policy is currently being implemented in the US [see Government gives doctors power to vaccinate children without parental consent]. Will this be the standard for countries from this point on?
This article is the ultimate proof that governments are desperate for people to take the COVID vaccine. We must wonder: why?
Why do they want our children to be vaccinated when they know that these “vaccines” cannot stop infection and prevent transmission? [Read CDC Head declares COVID ‘vaccines’ don’t prevent infections or transmissions, Fauci: Early COVID-19 vaccines will only prevent symptoms, not block infection].
Why do they want our children to take the vaccine when they are at no risk of COVID death? CDC updates planning scenarios, shows IFR lower than flu, Vaccinating children against COVID-19 is irresponsible and unethical, Are Kids at Risk of the Coronavirus Delta Variant?].
The UK already has one of the highest vaccination rates in the world, with 66% of its eligible population already fully vaccination, and 5.8% receiving at least one dose. Its case fatality rate is now at its lowest level, at 0.48%. Despite this, however, the UK has chosen to focus on the ever-increasing number of cases. If only the UK looked at the pattern, then they would see that the country is not alone in this experience and that all highly vaccinated countries are experiencing this “increase in cases” [see Israel, once the model for beating COVID, now has one of the highest infections in the world, New COVID surge in 4 out of 5 top vaccinated countries in the world, World’s most vaccinated nation activates new lockdowns as cases rise, COVID spiking in states with high vaccination rate]. Does the UK still think that vaccines can control the virus, despite the scientific evidence that they can’t? Or are governments hoping that cases would rise even more, hence the push to get more people to take the vaccines?
The COVID psychosis is coming back to bite us. If we continue down this path of counting “cases” without looking at the true clinical presentations, then we can expect that this “pandemic” will never end. We will continue on this same path of lockdowns, masking, and forced vaccination [read Faulty COVID-19 tests: Why prisoners love their jailers and never-ending lockdowns]. Is this the reason why the government continues to peruse the faulty RT-PCR? Do they really want us in a state of permanent emergency? [See Global COVID Summit pushes for global vaccination, creation of global fund “for future pandemics”].
Another point we want to emphasize is this: health care professionals cannot use Gillick competence if a child is in the custody of a responsible parent. So many studies have been done in the past regarding this.1https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/advances-in-psychiatric-treatment/article/competence-and-consent-to-treatment-in-children-and-adolescents/A74A44E64944084DFA0FA24EC4432A4F, https://cspm.csyw.qld.gov.au/procedures/support-a-child-in-care/decision-making-for-a-child#Determine_who_may_decide_a_custody_or_guardianship_matter, and http://www8.austlii.edu.au/nz/journals/VUWLawRw/2000/31.html. They cannot overrule parental consent, not when we are talking about an experimental product that has known side effects [read EMA finds vaccine link to heart inflammation, FDA adds heart inflammation warning to Pfizer, Moderna experimental vaccines, EMA confirms: AstraZeneca vaccine linked to rare blood clots, FDA adds warning to Johnson and Johnson vaccine for increased risk of rare neurological complication, FDA knew there would be many COVID cases among the fully vaccinated].
Are health care professionals ready for the slew of lawsuits that may come their way once they implement Gillick competence on children without consulting their lawful guardians? Will vaccinators be willing to take accountability for possible side effects of the vaccines? [Singapore acknowledges dangers of vaccinating children and teenagers, Vaxxed adolescents six times more likely to suffer heart problems than from COVID-19, Peer-reviewed research shows mRNA vaccines can cause neurodegenerative diseases, Experimental mRNA vaccines could cause long term chronic illnesses, Expert evaluation on adverse effects of the Pfizer-COVID-19 vaccination, Long-term dangers of experimental mRNA shots, Study: Risk of death following vaccination higher than COVID-19 among the most vulnerable groups]
We hope that vaccinators remember that the government and vaccine developers have no liability over the consequences of vaccination [Leaked Pfizer contracts show they knew of adverse effects and lack of long-term efficacy of vaccines, Big Pharma firm will not be held responsible for side effects of COVID-19 vaccine]. If vaccinators want to risk the lives of children using an illogical government policy, then they had better prepare to take accountability for it themselves.
Read Original Article
Read Online
Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.
Read Offline
Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.
