In this July 9, 2021 article published by Reuters, we learn that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has found a possible link between heart inflammation and the mRNA vaccines, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna. EMA says that the conditions, myocarditis, and pericarditis must be listed as side effects of the two vaccines. [This comes after the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has acknowledged the likely connection between the vaccines and heart inflammation, and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required producers of mRNA vaccines to add a warning label, read CDC finds “likely” link between heart inflammation and mRNA vaccination and FDA adds heart inflammation warning to Pfizer, Moderna experimental vaccines].

According to EMA, cases of heart inflammation occurred more often after the second dose in younger adult men. EMA reviewed more than 300 cases of heart inflammation in the European Union, Iceland, Norway, and Liechtenstein.

The EMA also advised that individuals with a history of capillary leak syndrome (CLS) should not be vaccinated with the Johnson & Johnson jab. EMA also asked AstraZeneca to add CLS as a side effect of the vaccine.

EMA says that despite these new developments, the benefits of the shots still outweighed the risks.

Editor’s Note: How many more health conditions will be found to be connected with the mRNA vaccines? How many more need to suffer before these health regulators finally accept that these vaccines are dangerous and should be stopped?

There were early indicators that these vaccines were going to cause serious health effects, but people ignored it [see A touted COVID-19 vaccine has already harmed people, Expect failure and adverse reactions with coronavirus vaccine, Johnson & Johnson halts coronavirus vaccine clinical trial after participant experience “adverse event”, Sinovac vaccine trial in Brazil halted after serious adverse event, AstraZeneca pauses clinical trials due to safety issue]. Experts have already cautioned in December 2020 of the dangers of these fast-tracked vaccines [see Petition against Pfizer and other coronavirus vaccines launched in the UK]. Now that we are seeing more and more people exhibiting life-altering adverse effects, we wonder how health regulators can allow these vaccines to continue to be rolled out, especially with the low mortality rate associated with COVID-19 [see CDC updates planning scenarios, shows IFR lower than flu]. Can people sitting as decision-makers in these regulatory agencies still sleep at night knowing the damages they have caused among unsuspecting citizens who trusted them with their lives?

How can these vaccines still have higher benefits compared to their risks, when the adverse events are happening among people who are in no danger of dying or experiencing severe symptoms due to COVID-19?

Is another agenda being pushed when the science, the facts, and the data are all showing that these vaccines are dangerous? Are we now seeing the face of a control agenda being rolled out?

Read Original Article