December 23, 2024

AstraZeneca CEO Said Immunocompromised Should Not Take the COVID Jabs

AstraZeneca CEO Said Immunocompromised Should Not Take the COVID Jabs

On April 20, 2022, Project Veritas published a video on their YouTube channel, obtained by a courageous source inside the pharmaceutical company, AstraZeneca, recording the CEO, Pascal Soriot, on a zoom making statements that our government has been trying to suppress.

The video was a recording of a December 2020 company-wide Zoom call. AstraZeneca CEO discusses complications with COVID vaccines that contradict guidance from health officials on the matter, such as the World Health Organization.

The CEO said people with immune deficiencies SHOULD NOT receive the vaccine. He suggested that antibody treatment was often a better alternative.

Quoting Soriot: “Like if you have an immune disease, lupus, or some other immune condition, you cannot—or multiple sclerosis, you can’t be vaccinated. So, millions of people in the world will need protection that cannot be coming from a vaccine. So, the longer antibody has enormous potential.”

Also, he said, “the long-acting antibody is quite unique because this is the only combination that will potentially last more than six months, up to potentially 12 months, and protect people for a long time.”

Editor’s Note: This was a 2020 video; what could have stifled AstraZeneca to say this publicly? Or perhaps, were the glimmering profits too blinding to make one forget about values?

Also, despite Soriot seemingly pushing for monoclonal antibodies, the question now could be this: What gives his company a better revenue opportunity? We know AstraZeneca has monoclonal antibodies for covid, which was approved recently1https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/09/fda-clears-astrazeneca-covid-antibody-treatment-for-immunocompromised.html. Therefore, if in 2020, they knew that the touted covid vaccines should not be given to the general population (means everyone), thus diminishing the chance to rake billions, could it be that monoclonal antibodies had been on the pipeline all along?

Nonetheless, it doesn’t remove the fact that these covid vaccine proponents deceived the public, prioritized those immunocompromised, and keep on peddling that jabs are safe and effective, despite the trial data saying otherwise. [See Vaccine-injured Speak Out: DO NOT TAKE THE VACCINE; Covid-19 Vaccine Trials Adverse Events are Under-Reported]. Also, early vaccine recipients have reports of severe adverse events and fatality, and yet, some governments continue with their goal to vaccinate their citizens [see AAPS: Blood clots happen with all COVID vaccines; Guillian-Barre Syndrome after COVID vaccination more common than previously reported; Israel reports link between rare cases of heart inflammation and COVID-19 vaccination in young men; 72-year old man in CDO dies minutes after getting first AstraZeneca injection; More than 5,000 people who received mRNA vaccine experienced adverse effects; Four Pfizer trial volunteers developed Bell’s palsy but FDA denies it was caused by the shot]. Is it because they reap earnings from it, or perhaps, either they halt or carry on, they have to pay for the jabs? [See Poland braces for legal battle as it declines to take or pay for more COVID vaccines; Pfizer Controls Health Policy of 110 Countries, CCH Challenges the Duterte Government to Make Public Its Contract with Pfizer].

Also, if these jabs are genuinely harmless, why do some governments talk about compensation for vaccine injuries? [see If COVID vaccines were safe, why are governments talking about compensation for vaccine injuries?; Thailand to pay $45M over vaccine side effects; Singapore acknowledges dangers of vaccinating children and teenagers]. However, some countries make it easier for a camel to pass through an eye of a needle than to get compensation for covid jab injuries like US2https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o919 and Philippines3https://caro.doh.gov.ph/philhealth-releases-guidelines-for-covid-19-vaccine-injury-and-death-compensation/.   

What do we do with this new information we have? One thing is certain, Big Pharma gains from people’s gullibility; therefore, we now must guard our health and stop relying on our governments to dictate what we have to do with our health. [See Bayer Pharmaceuticals President Admits mRNA “Vaccines” are Cell and Gene Therapy; How Public’s Confidence in Big Pharma Fuels Greed and Deception; Freedom Is Our Birthright, Not Conditional Based on Medical Status].

Watch the Video

2 thoughts on “AstraZeneca CEO Said Immunocompromised Should Not Take the COVID Jabs

  1. Unfortunately I took two AZ vax but didn’t take any boosters as by that time I was beginning to tumble what was going on. I did get Omnicrom last Christmas but no problem. I am 79 yrs old.
    Keep up the good work. This needs to be exposed as the Big Pharma cartels are joining ranks with the mass media and even governments including the NHO.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

×
×