The following article was written by Shin Jie Yong, a post-graduate student from Sunway University in Malaysia. On his Medium profile, Yong says that his aim is to “improve scientific literacy in this age of information overload and mis/disinformation, especially on controversial and polarizing topics”.
The article cited below was published last May 18, 2022, through Medium. In it, Yong cites sources showing that the mRNA COVID shots could lead to “blood vessel dysfunction and inflammation”, which could lead to blood clots. Yong says that these incidences of these “blood vessel dysfunction and inflammation” are minor, and short-lived, and they are not unique to the mRNA shots. He closes his article with the following words: “we should expect some level of inflammation and blood vessel dysfunction for 1–2 days after getting the mRNA vaccine — or any other vaccine for that matter. But such issues are only temporary and not severe enough to cause an adverse event in the studies described above”
Editor’s Note: We add this article to this website for two reasons. First, when the COVID shots were first rolled out, several reports have already attempted to alert the government about the possibility of blood clots as an adverse event, which they ignored. [Read AAPS: Blood clots happen with all COVID vaccines, New York Times: Some recipients of experimental COVID vaccines developing rare autoimmune disease after jab. Also, read Rare Clotting Complication Seen After mRNA Vaccine: Case Report].
Meanwhile, in aid of the propaganda, the mainstream media and “fact-checkers” launched campaigns to demolish the claim that mRNA shots could cause blood clots.https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-mrna-clots-idUSL1N2PY1K2
But with the release of the Pfizer documents and more doctors speaking up, we are seeing the propaganda turn. Just recently, the FDA limited the use of the Johnson&Johnson vaccine citing blood clot risk, using it to divert attention away from the mRNA shots. [Read FDA Limits Use of J&J Vaccine Over Blood Clotting Disorder, But Experts Say Pfizer, Moderna Shots Pose Similar Risk].
And now, as more evidence against the mRNA shots accumulates, we are seeing writers like Yong agreeing that indeed, the mRNA shots might cause blood clots, but they are “minor and short-lived”. Do you still remember when the government used this phrase? [As a reminder, you might want to read the articles Former FDA official: FDA negligent in not investigating myocarditis cases, CDC advisory panel set to meet to discuss higher-than-expected cases of myocarditis among the young vaccinated, Journal article confirms younger males at higher risk of myocarditis following COVID vaccination, VAERS cases, “just the tip of the iceberg”, JAMA study shows 133x risk of myocarditis following COVID vaccination, Major study finds COVID shots increase risk of heart inflammation up to 120 fold, Study: Teens with vaccine-induced myocarditis experienced persistent heart abnormalities].
As the truth is coming out, we are also now discovering the strategy they used to twist facts and manipulate public perception. This is just one example of the many lies they told us about COVID, the lockdowns, the vaccines, and the vaccine cards.
The second reason we added this article is this: despite all the disclaimers made by Yong in his article, this is proof that governments lied to their citizens when they said that the vaccines were “safe and effective”. The possibility of blood clots was present from the very beginning, but they made their citizen believe that there was no risk to the COVID shots which is a clear violation of the policy for informed consent.
Now, if our governments (and Big Pharma) can go to great lengths in order to manipulate us into doing their bidding, don’t you think they have the capacity to lie about bigger things, for example, about the massive corruption of COVID funds and their participation to the undemocratic New World Order?
And oh as a bonus, Yong has been writing about the Monkeypox, and he is saying that the current outbreak warrants the precautionary principle. He recommends the return of the same policies used during COVID – face masks, indoor air ventilation, physical distancing, and contact tracing. What are your thoughts about this? [Also read WHO calls for emergency meeting as monkeypox cases in Europe cross 100].
Read Original Article
Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.
Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.