FDA Now Wants 75 Years to Release Pfizer Vaccine Documents, not just 55 Years

In a December 10, 2021 article published in The Defender, Dr. Michael Nevradakis reported that the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) now says it needs 75 years to fully release redacted versions of all documents related to the agency’s approval of Pfizer’s Comirnaty COVID-19 vaccine [Initially, the FDA said that it needed to 55 years to produce the documents, see FDA Wants 55 years to Process FOIA Request Over Vaccine Data].

In a legal brief filed on December 7, 2021, the FDA said that an additional 59,000 pages of documents, which was not included in the agency’s earlier filings, needed to be processed.[1]FDA-Brief-and-Appendix-e3999de9aee38921cd4fbb035c33e304.pdf (sirillp.com) The agency did not explain why those documents were initially overlooked.

The agency said it could release an initial batch of approximately 12,000 pages by the end of January 2022.[2]FDA Brief – DocumentCloud Past that date, the FDA said it can process and disclose only 500 pages of documents per month. This would mean that the entire cache of documents would not be fully released until 2096.

Remarking on the FDA’s latest request to extend the timeline from 55 to 75 years, Attorney Aaron Siri, who represents Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT) stated[3]https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/fda-doubles-down-asks-federal-judge:

“[I]f you find what you are reading difficult to believe — that is because it is dystopian for the government to give Pfizer billions, mandate Americans to take its product, prohibit Americans from suing for harms, but yet refuse to let Americans see the data underlying its licensure…The lesson yet again is that civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure.”

Editor’s Note: FDA knew from the start these jabs can cause severe adverse events, yet it supported the advertisement of safe and effective narrative [see FDA knew COVID vaccines would lead to severe adverse events, sanitized info was given to people to prevent vaccine-hesitancy; FDA Panel Recommends Pfizer’s Low-dose Covid Jab for Young Children Ages Five to 11 Without the Safety Data; FDA Report Finds All-Cause Mortality Higher Among Vaccinated; FDA knew there would be many COVID cases among the fully vaccinated]. Now the drug regulator is essentially saying that it has not thoroughly processed all the documents from the Pfizer filing. Can you see the problem with this, knowing that millions (if not billions) around the world have already received this “vaccine”? How can the FDA still keep track of the millions of people who were injured by the Pfizer shot if it hasn’t even thoroughly processed the initial documents from the company?

Clearly, the FDA is no longer safeguarding the interests of people and it is serving as “pushers” for the Pfizer vaccines. Asking the court for 75 years before fully releasing the Pfizer documents means that no other scientist can assess Pfizer’s claims of safety and efficacy. Is the FDA perhaps trying to shield Pfizer from scrutiny?

Another point, why does FDA go to great lengths to cover up a particular entity when it should be the guardian of the citizens’ health? Does this show that regulators are captives of Big Pharma? [See FDA Committee Members Reviewing Pfizer Vaccine For Children Have Connections with Pfizer; Power struggle between FDA and Big Pharma comes in full display; The meaning of the FDA resignations.]

The first set of Pfizer documents has already shown many issues with the Pfizer trials. There is no doubt that the other documents being hidden from us will only reinforce the problems that were already seen by other scientists [see Pfizer’s Assassin Vaccine; Covid-19 Vaccine Trials Adverse Events are Under-Reported; Canadian health professionals release presentation detailing the dangers of Pfizer COVID injections].

Read Original Article

Read Online

Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.

Read Offline

Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.