April 25, 2024

Documents reveal FDA and Pfizer knew COVID Vaccine caused Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease

0

In this May 4, 2022 article published by The Expose, we see documentary evidence from the most recent Pfizer data dump confirming both the company and the FDA knew of the possible risk of Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED) more commonly called Antibody-Dependent Enhancement (ADE).

The article goes on to dismantle the Pfizer document’s conclusion that VAED is a theoretical risk for the vaccine by showing how governments around the world are attempting to hide the real-world evidence of ADE by failing to publish data on hospitalizations and death of the double jabbed. Using the non-categorized data from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), the authors show that all age groups who received the vaccine are showing an increased COVID-19 death rate which indicates that the COVID shots are ineffective and that they are now making vaccinated people susceptible to more severe COVID.

Editor’s Note: ADE is a well-known side effect of previous coronavirus vaccines. Why wasn’t ADE specified as a possible side effect of the vaccine when there was some evidence of it during the trial?

Scientists making conclusions that are not supported by data has become commonplace these days. In fact, we know of several recent “scientific” researches that have done this [see Dr. Byram Bridle: Study saying unvaccinated increases COVID risk for vaccinated must be retracted immediately, India slams WHO for erroneously reporting 4 million COVID deaths in country, Top infectious disease expert in UK reveals anomalous practices in deciding country’s pandemic response, New Pfizer data confirms: Clinical trial data was compromised, WHO Makes Outright Lie, Says Omicron Dangerous for Unvaccinated but Data Says Otherwise, Scientific fraud at top medical journals affect world COVID-19 policy].

Remember: this was the data that the FDA attempted to hide for 75 years! [Read FDA Now Wants 75 Years to Release Pfizer Vaccine Documents, not just 55 Years].

Read Original Article

Read Online

Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.

Read Offline

Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *