Spanish Government Confirmed that the SARS-CoV-2 Virus Does Not Exist
An October 4, 2021 article published in Free West Media reports on the results of a Freedom of Information Inquiry to the Spanish government.
According to the report, the government responded to a public request from critical citizens, including the organizations Asociación Liberum and Biólogos por la Verdad (Biologists for the Truth) through Freedom of Information, to quote: “The Spanish Ministry of Health does not have SARS-CoV-2 cultures for experiments and does not have a directory of laboratories that have isolation cultures for experiments.”
Also, one media portal urged those who have been vaccinated: “Take this document and go to your family doctor or your health center and ask for explanations. Because something has been injected into your body, the person who administered it to you does not even know what it is for or what is contained in it. Will this wake people up, or will they go back to sleep?”
Editor’s Note: Spain is the 9th country that brought the heath minister to court, demanding evidence for the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.[See previous eight FOIs1See the list of other countries which have admitted that they have not isolated the virus, read https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/ Unfortunately, all health ministers failed to come up with proof that the virus does exist.
Also, in line with this, 116 health and science institutions from more than 20 countries have failed to provide even one record describing “SARS-COV-2” purification, containing proof of “its” existence. [See all FOIs in the link above, including the Philippines. The report for FOI in the Philippines has been reported in CCH FOI Bombshell: DOH Admits No Evidence SARS-CoV-2 Isolated. Yet Government Locked Down Nation Due to Virus No Country Has Yet Proven to Exist. Also read RT-PCR tests are scientifically meaningless]
There is no reference material used for the RT-PCR test. What strain then, is being used by test kits? If no government has isolated the virus, how sure are they that the strains included in the test kits are truly that of SARS-CoV-2?
The unacceptable thing about these court cases is that deceitful MSM refuses to report them; however, in the case of Spain, one media outlet has captured the story, for the reason that lawyers had demanded to have it broadcasted so that the masses would be informed. See the video below, skip to 2:04 to see the news.
RT-PCR tests were used to implement lockdowns, however, we are now discovering that there is no real assurance that the test was accurate or that it has the capacity to detect SARS-Cov-2. To quote the Spanish biochemist who spoke in the video (see above): “All positive patients, no confirmed disease with viral culture. RNA is separated from the rest of the material collected. This RNA enters specific machines that read it on the basis of a template.” This means that positive cases are not confirmed to be COVID-19 cases. This makes the RT-PCR test useless and meaningless. [See Manitoba Government Chief Microbiologist: 56% of positive “cases” are not infectious, but products of misleading RT-PCR tests; New York Times: More experts questioning RT-PCR testing; Alberta, Canada, ends all COVID-19 restrictions after admitting in court they have no SARS-CoV-2 reference virus for their RT-PCR tests; RT-PCR tests are scientifically meaningless], also read Faulty COVID-19 tests: Why prisoners love their jailers and never-ending lockdowns.]
Do governments know about this fact? Do their Health Advisors acknowledge the evidence or do they perhaps think: “let’s continue with the scare tactics and everyone will cower in fear?” If we wake up to this truth, and we start to push back, the narrative will collapse. Authorities will begin to point fingers and say: “I was just told to do it!”
We must then ask: “By whom?”
Read Original Article
Read Online
Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.
Read Offline
Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.