German Neurologist: Oxygen deprivation due to face masks cause permanent neurological damage

The following is a transcript of a banned YouTube video of Dr. Margarite Griesz-Brisson, one of Europe’s leading neurologists, who explains the damage that face masks can do to our bodies.

Griesz- Brisson says that chronic oxygen deprivation due to the wearing of face masks can lead to neurodegenerative diseases which will take years to develop. She adds that at the beginning, individuals experiencing oxygen deprivation get warning symptoms such as “headaches, drowsiness, dizziness, issues in concentration, slowing down of reaction time”. She says that when exposed to the same condition for a long time, all the symptoms disappear but the body’s “efficiency will remain impaired and the under-supply of oxygen in your brain continues to progress”.

Griesz- Brisson adds that oxygen deprivation also prevents the nerve cells in the brain from dividing normally. Lost nerve cells can no longer be recovered, which then amplifies the degenerative process in the brain.

Griesz- Brisson says that face masks are especially harmful for children and adolescents as their brains need a lot of oxygen in order to learn and function properly. She says that as neurodegenerative diseases takes years to develop, continued masking will lead to increase in dementia in the future. She adds, “when, in ten years…the younger generations couldn’t reach their god-given potential, it won’t help to say ‘we didn’t need the masks'”.

She then proceeds to call on her colleagues to speak up against this crime, and call for the end of mandatory masking and lockdowns in all countries.

Editor’s Note: We were told to wear masks because it could stop droplets from spreading, despite no evidence of this claim. They said, “just wear it, it has no side effects anyway”. And so the world wore masks, and the dumbing down of society continues. The effects are long term and irreversible, and will have an impact on future societies.

There is nothing new with Griesz- Brisson’s claims. We know from basic life support that if the brain is deprived of oxygen, permanent bodily damage can occur. We were told that the brain could only tolerate a maximum of 10 minutes of oxygen deprivation, before the whole body starts shutting down. Has the pandemic changed this fact? Masking creates an environment of gradual oxygen deprivation – it might take days or months, but it is oxygen deprivation nonetheless.

Why are we using this dangerous intervention? Has there been a randomized controlled trial (RCT) showing that masking is safe? We ask because in every medical intervention proposed for the treatment of COVID, from hydroxychloroquine to Ivermectin, an RCT has always been a criteria before widespread use. Why is masking treated any different?

We know that the evidence against masks is mounting. For example, in 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) published a document which said that there is no evidence showing that masks reduce transmission, and that it is conditionally recommended in severe epidemics [see Will the real WHO please stand up?]. The data on COVID shows that it is nothing close to severe. Moreover, an RCT involving almost 5,000 participants, found that masks do not prevent infection [see Danish mask study now published: Masks do not reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection]. A new study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the biggest study on masking to date, has a different conclusion. It found that masking prevented infection by only 1.8% after 100 days.¹see this video from Del Bigtree at Highwire: https://www.bitchute.com/video/w4ajebnHdsg3/ Now, does this benefit outweigh the risks of masking? [For further details on masks, see the transcript of Gising, Be Awake! Episode 2: ECQ shows low IQ].

We also examined the details of the Danish mask study²Danish mask study now published: Masks do not reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection and the CDC study that seems to contradict each other. We discovered that the Danish mask study did a randomized controlled trials (RCT) while the CDC used limited data from selected areas in states (not data from entire states) in their analysis. This shows that the CDC study has a methodological bias and is not as rigorous as the Danish mask study [see Debunking the CDC study on mask mandates to learn more].

• 1
  see this video from Del Bigtree at Highwire: https://www.bitchute.com/video/w4ajebnHdsg3/
• 2
  Danish mask study now published: Masks do not reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection