Ending the COVID-19 “Scamdemic”

Billions believe that we are in the middle of a COVID-19 “pandemic”. Seven highly significant scientific and legal developments demonstrate that, in reality, this health emergency was a manufactured “pandemic”; a scam, a global “scamdemic”.

Fear-Inducing Mainstream Narrative of COVID-19

Here is the mainstream global COVID-19 pandemic narrative.

COVID-19 is very infectious. The tests are showing massive amounts of infections for COVID-19. Hospitals are filled up with patients. Media is trumpeting second waves of the pandemic in countries. The mantra is we have to stop the spread of, even eliminate the deadly virus.

Therefore government authorities are locking down nations. Draconian measures, including shutting down of businesses, continuous use of facemasks and face shields, curfews, social distancing, contact tracing, barricades, travel passes, and other measures, are widespread. Fear and hysteria are pervasive in societies.

This fear-laden world considers alternative scientific explanations as anathema. These fact and science-based alternative perspectives are rapidly censored and suppressed by mainstream media and Big Tech, including Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Google, Amazon, and others. Well-known scientists who are speaking out against the “scamdemic” are heavily criticized and ostracized by their own colleagues.

Mercifully this hysterical mainstream narrative is starting to crumble. Seven current global developments now cast serious doubts on this mainstream narrative. They are collectively showing that many of the outrageous policies of government have very little scientific basis, if any. The “rebels” are coming from the mainstream including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Center for Disease Control (CDC) of the USA; Harvard, Oxford and Stanford universities, among many others. (See more below.)

Before going into more details regarding these seven developments, I want to explicitly say, to avoid misunderstanding, that I am not saying that there never was a COVID-19 disease, even if, as will be seen below, the causative agent or systemic conditions remain unknown until today. Rather the concern is that the demographically selective danger of this relatively benign disease was blown out of proportion, placed people into panic mode, predisposing them to accept any or all freedom and human rights-restricting measures that eventually torpedoed the global economy and adversely affected the lives billions of people in the planet.

Seven Global Developments Challenging Mainstream COVID-19 Brainwashing

1. The Great Barrington Declaration

The first important global development is the highly successful Great Barrington Declaration or “GB Declaration.” More than 47,300 prominent doctors and scientists plus more than 600,000 signatories from the concerned public have signed the Declaration. The latter group includes many other PhDs and scientists from other fields of specialization.¹These numbers are as of 25 November 2020. The number of signatories is still growing. Thus the numbers above will be larger when the public reads this article. Elon Musk also tweeted his support for the Declaration.²https://www.newsweek.com/elon-musk-covid-lockdown-great-barrington-declaration-1540200 They are calling for a “Focused Protection” that would include lifting lockdowns and focusing resources on the vulnerable sectors of society, especially the elderly, and opening schools.

Here are key statements from the GB Declaration:

“As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.

“Coming from both the left and right, and around the world, we have devoted our careers to protecting people. Current lockdown policies are producing devastating effects on short and long-term public health. The results (to name a few) include lower childhood vaccination rates, worsening cardiovascular disease outcomes, fewer cancer screenings and deteriorating mental health – leading to greater excess mortality in years to come, with the working class and younger members of society carrying the heaviest burden. Keeping students out of school is a grave injustice.

“Keeping these measures in place until a vaccine is available will cause irreparable damage, with the underprivileged disproportionately harmed.

Fortunately, our understanding of the virus is growing. We know that vulnerability to death from COVID-19 is more than a thousand-fold higher in the old and infirm than the young.³Author’s note: CDC data, however, is showing that COVID-19 is not 1000x but “only” 135% greater threat than flu to individuals 70 years of age and above. See discussion below in this paper. Indeed, for children, COVID-19 is less dangerous than many other harms, including influenza.

As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity.”⁴Herd immunity is sometimes also known as population immunity.

Mainstream Media (MSM) predictably lambasted the Declaration as unscientific and misguided.⁵https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/19/opinion/coronavirus-herd-immunity.html But MSM is too late. The background of the medical scientists and doctors who signed the Declaration come from some of the most prestigious universities of the world, including Harvard, Oxford, Stanford, Johns Hopkins – just to name a few. They not only demonstrated that they knew what they were speaking about. They were also able to influence key decision-makers to take them seriously.

2. WHO: Lockdowns Aggravate Poverty

And this leads us to the second development. Recently Dr. David Nabarro, Special Envoy of the World Health Organization (WHO), came out saying that countries should be wary of using lockdowns as their preferred strategy to contain COVID-19.

Dr. Nabarro said. ‘We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as a primary means of control of this virus.’⁶https://twitter.com/spectator/status/1314573157827858434?s=20 ‘Lockdowns just have one consequence that you must never ever belittle, and that is making poor people an awful lot poorer’.⁷Coronavirus: WHO joins the Great Barrington Declaration. https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/coronavirus-who-backflips-on-virus-stance-by-condemning-lockdowns/news-story/f2188f2aebff1b7b291b297731c3da74

In his statement to the press, Dr. Nabarro referred to the Great Barrington Declaration as something important to consider. “When asked about the petition, Dr Nabarro had only good things to say. ‘Really important point by Professor Gupta,’ he said.⁸https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/coronavirus-who-backflips-on-virus-stance-by-condemning-lockdowns/news-story/f2188f2aebff1b7b291b297731c3da74

Dr. Sunetra Gupta of the University of Oxford, Dr. Martin Kulldorff of Harvard University and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford University, all accomplished and renowned epidemiologists, wrote the Great Barrington Declaration.  

3. CDC:  IFR of COVID-19 Mostly Below that of Flu

This contrarian advice of the WHO comes at the heels of another devastating development versus the mainstream narrative. This is the third event of global significance. This time the message comes from the prestigious Center for Disease Control (CDC), an institution that MSM loves to quote endlessly. However the MSM was unusually silent when the CDC de facto dampened fears that the virus was deadly.

The CDC released new official figures for the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of COVID-19. This disease is clearly not as dangerous as once imagined. For ages 19 and below, for example, the chances of dying from COVID-19 is at least one thousand times less likely as compared with seasonal flu.

Here are the new CDC estimates of risks for the different age groups.⁹https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html

See TABLE 1 immediately below.

TABLE 1. Risk of Dying from COVID-19 as Compared with Flu

Age Group	Infection Fatality Rate (IFR)	Survival Rate
0-19 years	0.00003%	99.99997%
20-49 years	0.0002%	99.9998%
50-69 years	0.005	99.995%
70+ years	0.054	99.946%

The IFR for flu is estimated in the range of 0.04 to 0.1%. Taking the lower IFR figure for flu at 0.04%,¹⁰If we take the higher range for flu, then the IFR for COVID-19 would even be much less as compared with the IFR of flu. This means that flu is more dangerous than COVID-19 even for the so-called COVID-19 vulnerable group (70+ years). we can calculate the following.

Those less than 19 years of age are a thousand times less like to get COVID-19 as compared with flu. Similarly, those between 20-49 years of age are around a hundred times less likely to get COVID-19. Those between 50-69 years of age are around 9-10x less like to get COVID-19. Those who are 70+ years of age are 135% more likely to get COVID as compared with flu.

4. CDC Again: No scientific evidence that SARS-CoV-2 harms human tissues

People all over the world are freaking out when they see the daily numbers in the rise of infections from COVID-19. These bloated figures are mostly misleading artifacts of the notoriously inaccurate RT-PCR tests.¹¹The inherent defect of RT-PCR will be touched upon in more detail below. In addition, most do not realize that the pathogenic nature of SARS-CoV-2 has not been scientifically established. In short, the COVID-19 virus has not been empirically shown to harm human tissues.¹²https://covidcalltohumanity.org/cdc-published-article-showing-sars-cov-2-not-infectious-to-humans/

Sometime in June 2020, CDC published the results of a scientific experiment conducted by 20 virologists wherein they tried to demonstrate that solutions containing a portion of the putative SARS-CoV-2 virus would infect human tissues. They placed three kinds of human tissues in high concentrations of solutions containing the putative SARS-CoV-2 virus. The results were counterintuitive. None of the cells from these human tissues were infected by the putative virus of COVID-19.¹³The word “putative” is used because the proven existence of the virus SARS-CoV-2 is only asserted, not proven. The next section will deal with this shocking truth. Only poisoned monkey cells showed “viral growth”.

Dr. Thomas Cowan, an independent medical scientist and doctor, helps the intelligent lay public translate the arcane gobbledygook of scientific language. First he cites the actual article itself.

‘Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T).  In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells. … Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection.  No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells, which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection.  In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection.’

Dr. Cowan then translates what the scientific article was actually saying.

“What does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community?  When virologists attempt to prove infection, they have three possible “hosts” or models on which they can test.  The first is humans. Exposure to humans is generally not done for ethical reasons and has never been done with SARS-CoV-2 or any coronavirus.  The second possible host is animals. Forgetting for a moment that they never actually use purified virus when exposing animals, they do use solutions that they claim contain the virus.  Exposure to animals has been done once with SARS-CoV-2, in an experiment that used mice.  The researchers found that none of the wild (normal) mice got sick. In a group of genetically modified mice, a statistically insignificant number lost some fur.  They experienced nothing like the illness called Covid 19.” [Emphasis added.]

“The third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many times, such inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue, unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.

“The shocking thing about the above quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing  SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested.  In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this “new coronavirus” is not infectious to human beings.  It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.¹⁴The content of this section is taken from: https://drtomcowan.com/only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus/ [Emphasis in the original.]

5. SARS-CoV-2 Virus has never been proven to exist.

Perhaps the most controversial of these global developments is the increasingly scientific finding that the virus behind COVID-19 remains unknown. It has never been proven, using Koch’s Postulates, to exist as an independent disease-causing agent.¹⁵https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/

The golden standard in epidemiology to prove the existence of a disease agent, including a virus, is Koch’s Postulates. This could partially explain why the 20 virologists were not able to prove the infectious nature of SARS-CoV-2 because the putative virus does not exist.

Professor Stefano Scoglio, scientific researcher and Nobel Prize Candidate for Medicine, 2018, explains the four basic steps involved in Koch’s Postulates. These are: “a) physically isolate the micro-organisms, through filtering methods, from a patient; b) grow the isolated micro-organisms in a culture broth; c) inject this broth of microorganisms in a guinea pig, and evaluate if the symptoms generated by that injection are similar to the symptoms of the original patient; d) isolate the microorganism from the newly infected patient and grow it in a broth culture. [Following sentence indented as a paragraph.]

“These postulates were applied to actual microorganisms, bacteria, but as they are logical postulates, they apply also to non-organisms such as viruses, which are non living particles made of a strand of RNA (or DNA) covered by a lipoprotein capsid. …. the reality is that the SARS-Cov2 virus has never been isolated and tested. I looked at all the studies claiming that they isolated and even tested the virus, but they all have done something very different…”¹⁶https://www.facebook.com/notes/stefano-scoglio/the-invented-pandemic-the-lack-of-virus-isolation-and-the-invalid-covid-19-test/10219132803013133/. See also, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Viral Diseases, CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel , 13/07/2020, p.39 and European Commission, Working Document of Commission Services, Current performance of COVID-19 test methods and devices and proposed performance criteria, April 16 2020, p.19 [Emphasis added.]

6. SARS-CoV-2 images generated by computers, not actual pictures of the virus

Therefore, since no one really has an idea of what the virus is, scientists agreed on what the speculative virus should look like. Citing the same CDC study authored by 20 virologists, Dr. Thomas Cowan explains this highly fraudulent situation.

“First, in the section titled “Whole Genome Sequencing,” we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, that the CDC “designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512).

“To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. [Emphasis in the original.]  Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.

“The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by ‘consensus,’ sort of like a vote.  Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “unicorn,” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.”¹⁷https://drtomcowan.com/only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus/

In short, because the SARS-CoV-2 has never been scientifically isolated and proven to exist, scientist purveying the mainstream fictional narrative on COVID-19 have decided to impose a huge scam on governments and billions of human beings around the world. When these images first appeared in TV and social media, they looked frighteningly real and dangerous. It is outrageous then to discover that the virus of COVID-19 is nothing but a computer-generated fiction!

All Six Developments on Top of Previously Established Facts

Even with these six developments alone, the “scamdemic” nature of COVID-19 is very obvious. That the current pandemic is manufactured is even clearer when viewed with already established facts:

The RT-PCR artificially jacks up the number of infections. Most cycle thresholds of the current RT-PCR tests guarantee that one will obtain as much as 90% or greater false test-positives. Test-positive does not mean that one is infected with the disease.

We have belabored this point since April 2020. See for example these articles that can be found in our website, “Covid Call to Humanity”:  https://covidcalltohumanity.org/rt-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/; https://covidcalltohumanity.org/new-york-times-more-experts-questioning-rt-pcr-testing/;  https://covidcalltohumanity.org/the-danger-of-over-reliance-on-rt-pcr-tests/; https://covidcalltohumanity.org/bbc-coronavirus-tests-could-be-picking-up-dead-virus/; https://covidcalltohumanity.org/nicanor-perlas-declining-covid-19-deaths-we-need-vigilance-not-fear/; https://covidcalltohumanity.org/why-covid-19-is-guaranteed-to-never-end/; https://covidcalltohumanity.org/it-is-time-to-question-what-you-know-about-covid/; https://covidcalltohumanity.org/epidemiologist-reveals-circular-reasoning-used-to-support-the-validity-of-covid-19-test-kits/; and https://covidcalltohumanity.org/faulty-covid-19-tests-why-prisoners-love-their-jailers-and-never-ending-lockdowns/.

7. Litigating Purveyors of COVID-19 “Scamdemic” for Crimes Against Humanity

Given all the above, it is not surprising that an increasing number of groups are resorting to legal action against their governments for pursuing draconian lockdowns that are destroying the freedoms and livelihood of their citizens. We are seeing this happen in the US, in Canada, in Australia, and in other places.

For example, citizens in Lisbon, Portugal recently won a court case against their government. The Lisbon Court of Appeals has ruled for the release of four people who were isolated in accordance to the COVID-19 protocols in the country. The court said: ‘Given how much scientific doubt exists — as voiced by experts, i.e., those who matter — about the reliability of the PCR tests, given the lack of information concerning the tests’ analytical parameters, and in the absence of a physician’s diagnosis supporting the existence of infection or risk, there is no way this court would ever be able to determine whether C was indeed a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or whether A, B and D had been at a high risk of exposure to it.’

“The court adds that it is illegal for the Regional Health Authority to detain the “patients” when a doctor has not given a diagnosis and the patient has not given prior consent for isolation.”¹⁸https://covidcalltohumanity.org/portugese-court-rules-pcr-tests-as-unreliable-and-unlawful-to-quarantine-people/ . In what follows immediately below, we will see that the unreliability of the RT-PCR tests will be the basis of a global action suit against the WHO and other leading advocates of lockdown.

But perhaps the most serious and consequential legal action is the lawsuit that is being planned by a group of seasoned global litigators headed by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich. This brave lawyer is famous for his David-versus-Goliath legal challenges against giant transnational corporations including, among others, Duetsche Bank and Volkswagen for the alleged corrupt practices of these transnational corporations.¹⁹The above and forthcoming information are taken from https://neonnettle.com/news/12868-lawyers-suing-who-for-crimes-against-humanity-over-covid-lockdowns. This information also verified by listening to the 45+-minute video embedded in this article cited above.  

He and his group intend to file a lawsuit suit against the World Health Organization (WHO) and leading vocal proponents of the mainstream narrative on COVID-19, lockdowns, facemasks, social distancing, and other increasingly scientific dubious scientific practices that are destroying nations all over the world. Defendants will include Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, head of the World Health Organization, Dr. Christian Drosten, famous German virologist and originator of the current global protocols in RT-PCR testing, and Lothar Wieler, head of the Robert Koch Institute, Germany’s equivalent to the CDC.

There may be other defendants who will be charged for aggressively pushing inaccurate, misleading, and basically useless RT-PCR tests worldwide. These defective tests have been used to manipulate infection numbers worldwide to create the impression of a pandemic. These are the advocates of “tests, tests, tests” and extreme lockdown measures. Ghebreyesus pressured nations to lockdown by admonishing government leaders: “You are not doing enough”.

This international group of lawyers is going to charge these prominent individuals with “crimes against humanity”, the language and law used to prosecute Nazis at the end of World War II. They will also be filing class action suits involving thousands of people around the world. 

As this group rightly observes. The success of any litigation is based on facts. And they are confident that they have the relevant scientific facts on their side as can be seen in the profusion of scientific evidence questioning the mainstream narrative.

The litigation will focus upon the misuse of the unreliable RT-PCR tests.

Dr. Fuellmich explains:

‘Not only are PCR tests expressly not approved for diagnostic purposes, as is correctly noted on leaflets coming with these tests, and as the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, has repeatedly emphasized,” … “Instead, they are simply incapable of diagnosing any disease.

‘Contrary to the assertions of Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, which they have been making since the proclamation of the pandemic, a positive PCR test result does not mean that an infection is present …”

‘If someone tests positive, it does not mean that they are infected with anything, let alone with a contagious SARS-CoV-2 virus.’²⁰This is a point that this author has been making since the past 7 months with his articles posted in his website at: https://covidcalltohumanity.org/. See for example, https://covidcalltohumanity.org/nicanor-perlas-no-need-to-panic-over-infection-numbers-deaths-continue-to-decrease/

Fuellmich cited a CDC publication that stated: ‘Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019-nCoV is the causative agent for clinical symptoms. …. In short: This test cannot detect any infection, contrary to all false claims stating that it can.

Fuellmich concluded: ‘Under the rules of civil tort law, all those who have been harmed by these PCR test-induced lockdowns are entitled to receive full compensation for their losses …’

The Coming Collapse of  the COVID-19 Scamdemic Narrative

These seven global developments above provide the scientific evidence against the mainstream COVID-19 fairy tale whose main intention, consciously and unconsciously, was to scare the hell out of citizens all over the world.

Well, the party is over. Citizen action, including litigations, all over the world, will increasingly challenge the scamdemic of false tests, lockdowns, censorship of dissenting scientists, and a host of other problems spawned by this current attempt to force humanity into submission.

In the end, the world will know the Truth. And that Truth will set billions free! There is no force – neither that of repressive governments addicted to lockdowns; Big Tech and Big Pharma seeking censorship and immoral profits; Mainstream Media fanning hysteria, and other secular powers, that can defeat the Truth. The power of untainted and empirical scientific evidence is an unconquerable force.

Surely citizens of moral courage will uphold this Truth. They will mobilize this Truth to deconstruct the illusory prisons that have been constructed around the world on the basis of the scandalous scam called COVID-19 pandemic.

• 1
  These numbers are as of 25 November 2020. The number of signatories is still growing. Thus the numbers above will be larger when the public reads this article.
• 2
  https://www.newsweek.com/elon-musk-covid-lockdown-great-barrington-declaration-1540200
• 3
  Author’s note: CDC data, however, is showing that COVID-19 is not 1000x but “only” 135% greater threat than flu to individuals 70 years of age and above. See discussion below in this paper.
• 4
  Herd immunity is sometimes also known as population immunity.
• 5
  https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/19/opinion/coronavirus-herd-immunity.html
• 6
  https://twitter.com/spectator/status/1314573157827858434?s=20
• 7
  Coronavirus: WHO joins the Great Barrington Declaration. https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/coronavirus-who-backflips-on-virus-stance-by-condemning-lockdowns/news-story/f2188f2aebff1b7b291b297731c3da74
• 8
  https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/coronavirus-who-backflips-on-virus-stance-by-condemning-lockdowns/news-story/f2188f2aebff1b7b291b297731c3da74
• 9
  https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html
• 10
  If we take the higher range for flu, then the IFR for COVID-19 would even be much less as compared with the IFR of flu. This means that flu is more dangerous than COVID-19 even for the so-called COVID-19 vulnerable group (70+ years).
• 11
  The inherent defect of RT-PCR will be touched upon in more detail below.
• 12
  https://covidcalltohumanity.org/cdc-published-article-showing-sars-cov-2-not-infectious-to-humans/
• 13
  The word “putative” is used because the proven existence of the virus SARS-CoV-2 is only asserted, not proven. The next section will deal with this shocking truth.
• 14
  The content of this section is taken from: https://drtomcowan.com/only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus/
• 15
  https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/
• 16
  https://www.facebook.com/notes/stefano-scoglio/the-invented-pandemic-the-lack-of-virus-isolation-and-the-invalid-covid-19-test/10219132803013133/. See also, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Viral Diseases, CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel , 13/07/2020, p.39 and European Commission, Working Document of Commission Services, Current performance of COVID-19 test methods and devices and proposed performance criteria, April 16 2020, p.19
• 17
  https://drtomcowan.com/only-poisoned-monkey-kidney-cells-grew-the-virus/
• 18
  https://covidcalltohumanity.org/portugese-court-rules-pcr-tests-as-unreliable-and-unlawful-to-quarantine-people/ . In what follows immediately below, we will see that the unreliability of the RT-PCR tests will be the basis of a global action suit against the WHO and other leading advocates of lockdown.
• 19
  The above and forthcoming information are taken from https://neonnettle.com/news/12868-lawyers-suing-who-for-crimes-against-humanity-over-covid-lockdowns. This information also verified by listening to the 45+-minute video embedded in this article cited above.  
• 20
  This is a point that this author has been making since the past 7 months with his articles posted in his website at: https://covidcalltohumanity.org/. See for example, https://covidcalltohumanity.org/nicanor-perlas-no-need-to-panic-over-infection-numbers-deaths-continue-to-decrease/