Categories
What exactly is the nature of the virus? Global

CDC published article showing SARS-CoV-2 not infectious to humans

The following article by Dr. Tom Cowan explains in layman’s terms the findings of a research conducted and published by the Center for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) last June 2020.

Dr. Cowan highlights some of the more important points of the CDC article include the following:

(1) the researchers used 37 unpurified base pairs from the supposed 30,000 genomic sequence of the SARS-CoV-2. These 37 base pairs were inputted in a computer which then filled in the rest of the base pairs.

(2) No one has seen the complete 30,000 base pairs of the SARS-CoV-2 in actuality. What we have today are computer simulations which have been “agreed on” by researchers.

(3) Solutions in the experiment containing SARS-CoV-2 in high amounts were not infectious to human tissues.

Those who wish to read the actual study reviewed by Dr. Cowan may access it from the CDC website.

Editor’s Note: The article cited by Dr. Cowan is very difficult to read for ordinary citizens, and as such, it will be impossible to find the nuances discussed by Dr. Cowan above. We are grateful for scientists like Dr. Cowan who continue to open our eyes to the inconsistencies in the mainstream coronavirus narrative, and offering the basis for a new understanding of the virus and the illness it supposedly causes.

Dr. Cowan’s discoveries as has been stated by CDC is massive because it brings into question many of the widely held beliefs we have of the SARS-CoV-2. To what genomic sequence are swab samples being compared to when scientists say that an RT-PCR test is positive for the SARS-CoV-2? Is this genomic sequence truly of the new coronavirus? How is the virus causing the COVID-19 disease? If the CDC-defined SARS-CoV-2 is not infectious to humans, why are governments expanding testing even to those who showing with no symptoms? [Also read this article to understand the many issues with RT-PCR testing The danger of over-reliance on RT-PCR tests, New York Times: More experts questioning RT-PCR testing].

Like many doctors who are going against the mainstream narrative, Dr. Cowan has been highly censored, with his book The Contagion Myth recently removed by Amazon [see this video by Dr. Tom Cowan to learn more about the banned book: Why did Amazon ban the book The Contagion Myth?]. We know that labeling alternative views as “conspiracy theory” and “disinformation” as well as censoring and banning such information from platforms have been standard procedure for Big Tech since the beginning of this pandemic [read about The Pandemic of Censorship and Study: People who cross-check claims of mainstream media on COVID-19 get branded as “conspiracy theorists“]. Mainstream media says that Dr. Cowan’s views are easy to debunk, and yet, most of their publications about him are nothing more than smear campaigns.

Why is there a concerted effort to hide dissenting views from the general public? What gave Big Tech companies the authority to ban information? Do they think we are so incapable of determining fact from fiction that they need to become gate keepers of “truth”?

Read Original Article

Read Online

Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.

Read Offline

Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *