Trump’s Contradictory Ukraine Strategy: Peace or Prolonged Conflict?

Donald Trump intends to select retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg as ambassador to Ukraine and Russia, in line with a strategy of conditional US support for Ukraine contingent on peace talks with Russia. The Kellogg-Fleitz proposal calls for freezing US military delivery to Kyiv if it refuses to negotiate while increasing backing if Moscow opposes to push both sides to a settlement. Critics point to a lack of clarity and probable difficulties in securing peace without Ukraine recovering lost regions. Trump claims he is uniquely capable of ending the war and advocates for increasing European contributions to global security initiatives.

Editor’s Note: Donald Trump’s approach to resolving the Ukraine crisis appears contradictory, raising concerns about the consistency of his leadership. While he claims he can quickly end the war, choosing Keith Kellogg, whose stance involves conditional backing and perhaps prolonging the conflict by military escalation, appears to contradict this promise. This discrepancy reflects a larger pattern in Trump’s administration, in which appointees have occasionally followed agendas that are at odds with his professed intentions. Note his appointee for US Surgeon General as an example. [See: Freedom Fighters Divided: Trump’s Choice for US Surgeon General Indication of Worse Things To Come] If peace is the goal, clear and aligned strategies must replace political posturing. [See also: Trump, A Snake?: President-Elect Surrounds Himself With Operation Warpspeed Accomplices]

Read Original Article