Experts: US-funded lab helped Chinese Army’s bioterrorism program
The following article by Dr. Joseph Mercola was published on May 5, 2021. It summarized a documentary created by investigative journalist Sheryl Attkisson who looked into the origin of SARS-CoV-2 in connection with the US-China gain-of-function research on coronaviruses.
Attkisson presents the research of Dr. Peter Breggin who offers several pieces of evidence documenting Dr. Anthony Fauci’s involvement with the Chinese Communist and its military. Breggin also presents 15 questionable activities that Fauci is engaged in, and he asserts that Fauci’s funding of the gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses allowed the CCP to create bioweapons, including the SARS-CoV-2.
Mercola also goes on to review several other sources that offer the same conclusions as Dr. Breggin. Some of these sources include a March 30, 2021 article by journalist Josh Robin’s which was published by the Washington Post, David Asher, former lead investigator of the US State Department task force which looked into the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 who went on record to state that the Wuhan Insitute of Virology (WIV) was running a biological weapons program, and an April 25, 2021, article by Ian Burrell reported on new clues suggesting that the WIV helped the Chinese army find animal viruses.
Mercola closes this article by asserting that gain-of-function research must end. He says, “The same establishment that is drumming up panic by warning of the emergence of new, more infectious and dangerous variants are also busy creating them. They just never tell you about that part. Already, scientists have figured out a way to mutate SARS-CoV-2 such that it evades human antibodies. Were this mutated virus to ever get out, we’d be in quite a pickle”.
Editor’s Note: There was a reason why gain-of-function research was suspended by former President Barack Obama in 2014 [a previous article covers this, read New evidence ties COVID-19 origin to Wuhan lab, research funded by NIAID] How did Anthony Fauci relaunch these kinds of research without consulting the government?1To understand this statement better, read https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/fauci-reportedly-relaunched-nih-gain-of-function-research-without-consulting-white-house/
It is also important to note that the evidence for a man-made SARS-CoV-2 is stronger than a naturally-developed virus.2Read https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/origin-of-covid-people-or-nature/ for a rundown of this evidence. The only thing that is preventing people from concluding that the virus is man-made is that the World Health Organization (WHO) report focused on the natural-origin theory, and no real studies were done to rule out a laboratory leak as a potential cause.3See the WHO report here: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-convened-global-study-of-origins-of-sars-cov-2-china-part/
Despite the confusion surrounding the origin of SARS-CoV-2, we know for certain that there is no significant threat to the strains currently circulating the world. Based on our actual data, most people who get infected with the virus recover, and that those who recover develop antibodies [see CDC updates planning scenarios, shows IFR lower than flu, Study of 10-million person-identifiable PCR-test in Denmark shows young people protected from SARS-CoV-2 reinfection]. We also know that our immune system has the capacity to evolve so that it can protect us from future variants of the virus [see Our immune system evolves to fight coronavirus variants and New study: T-cells induced by COVID infection can respond to new SARS-CoV-2 variants]. For most normal people, this is the most important information we must remember.
But let’s not forget that in February 2021, a lab created a SARS-CoV-2 variant that can bypass acquired immunity from natural infection [see Lab just made a more dangerous SARS-CoV-2 strain]. Let’s not allow ourselves to be manipulated again in believing that such a strain can emerge naturally and that our immune system has no capacity to neutralize it.
Read Online
Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.
Read Offline
Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.
