From Alarmist to Skeptic: How Climate Change Narratives Are Shaping Global Policy

Tom Harris, the Executive Director of the International Climate Science Coalition, who now believes the movement is a hoax. He discussed his shift of perspective on The Ingraham Angle, claiming that a professor showed him there was no correlation between CO2 and temperatures, prompting him to reassess his position. Harris now claims that the climate hysteria is based on inaccurate models and that many scientists think there is no genuine threat. He also remarked that climatology is an immature science, and it is uncertain whether the planet would warm or cool.

Editor’s Note: Harris’ transition from climate alarmist to critic exemplifies how narratives have been used to serve specific political goals, frequently promoting alarmist ideas that are not supported by evidence or data. Many climate change proponents, for example, argue for severe steps that will completely revamp businesses and economies. Such rapid green transitions pose significant issues for underdeveloped nations that lack adequate assistance and infrastructure. It is vital to approach climate science with skepticism and notice when it is being used to manipulate politics or finances. [See also: Climate Experts Say Climate Change Is Based on Faulty Temperature Data, Globalists are Exploiting Climate Change Fears for Global Financial Control, A Call for Balanced Scientific Debate on the Climate Change Narratives by Randall Carlson, Bill Gates Fear Mongers Again, Predicts Dour Outlook for Humanity In Light of Climate Change, Sells High-Tech Solutions Made By His Companies]

Read Original Article