In a post on their Telegram channel, the World Doctors Alliance (WDA) cites two contrasting analyses of the adoption of the International Health Regulations (IHR) of the recently completed World Health Assembly (WHA). One post was from James Roguski, who said that adopting substantial amendments to the IHR is a “defeat” for freedom fighters. The other was from Dr. Meryl Nass, who says people should not worry about the IHR amendments. The WDA comments: “There is a clear schism in consciousness being implemented.” Which wolf wins?

Editor’s Note: We think it is now important for freedom fighters worldwide to examine the two documents cited by the WDA and scrutinize for themselves the implications of the adoption of the IHR. We hope that in the process of researching, people will also begin to discover what actions must be taken to move forward.

Read Original Article