Twitter Files Show How US Government Evaded Constitutional Provisions on Free Speech
In this January 2, 2023 article for Reason, J.D. Tuccille studies the implications of the Twitter files released last December 26, 2022 by investigative reporter David Zweig.
This latest Twitter document dump showed that Twitter had placed prominent scientists and medical experts who spoke against the mainstream COVID narrative on a blacklist at the behest of the Biden administration. Zweig said, “Twitter rigged the COVID debate by censoring info that was true but inconvenient to the US [government] policy…by discrediting doctors and experts who disagreed…and by suppressing ordinary users, including some sharing the CDC’s own data”.
Tucille expands the discussion by citing how other government agencies have leaned on the Twitter platform to create an “ideological monoculture” where judgment calls regarding content moderation have been deferred to meet the wishes of political authorities without regard for existing laws protecting free speech.
Editor’s Note: The Twitter Files is proof that Big Tech is now a tool for propaganda. Censorship has become a weapon for creating a semblance of consensus when there is none. It is proof that there is even the government, an institution that is supposed to safeguard the public interest, that has no qualms about using psychological warfare on their citizens in order to control the truth.
Why did governments need to control the truth when the science itself gave the solution to the COVID dilemma? What was their hidden agenda? This is what we should all be asking now. [See Vaccines: Trojan Horses for Global Sterilization and Surveillance, Mass Surveillance Technologies Put in Place During Pandemic Are Here To Stay, WEF Is Marching Us Toward A Life Of Passive Obedience, WEF’s 10 Most Chilling Vision Of The Future, The Ultimate Goal of the WEF is to Control and Change Life on Earth].
Tucille’s article shows us that controlling the COVID narrative is just the beginning of the widescale war on truth. This is dangerous for our democracies and civil liberties.
Read Original Article
Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.
Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.