CDC Director Acknowledges Agency Gave False Info On COVID Vax Monitoring
WASHINGTON, DC - JUNE 16: Rochelle Walensky, MD, MPH, Director, United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; speaks during the COVID Federal Response Hearing on Capitol Hill on June 16, 2022 in Washington, DC. The hearing was held to examine and update the ongoing Federal response to COVID-19, focusing on current status and future planning. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
In this September 13, 2022 article for The Epoch Times, Zachary Stieber reports on the letter of Dr. Rochelle Walensky, Director of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) which was recently made public.
Walensky’s letter, which was made in response to a question made by Sen. Ron Johnson, admitted that the CDC did not analyze certain types of adverse event reports in 2021 despite previously saying in February 2021 that they were analyzing all adverse event reports.
Walensky said, “CDC performed PRR analysis between March 25, 2022, through July 31, 2022…CDC also recently addressed a previous statement made to the Epoch Times to clarify that PRR were not run between February 26, 2021, to September 30, 2021.”
Editor’s Note: The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Standard Operating Procedures for COVID Vaccines published by CDC last January 29, 2021, specified that the organization would conduct a data mining analysis of vaccine safety data called Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) to detect which adverse events were occurring at higher than expected rates.
In a June 2022 response to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request filed by the Children’s Health Defense, the CDC said that it did not conduct PPRs, saying that “data mining is outside of th[e] agency’s purview”. Why did the CDC release the January 2021 document if data mining was beyond their mandate? And why did the CDC conduct a PPR analysis in 2022 if they were not allowed to do this?
Most importantly, why did the CDC only conduct a PPR analysis in March 2022 when they knew in December 2020 that the COVID shots were experimental and needed to be monitored? If there was no PPR analysis done in the early days of the “vaccine” rollout, what was CDC’s proof in reiterating that the shots were “safe and effective”?
We must remember that these shots were mandated in many institutions worldwide. Many people lost their jobs because of it. Others have lost their lives. If the CDC did not conduct safety studies post-rollout, then who did?
This is clear proof that the CDC has been lying all along. The question we should all be asking now is: why?
Read Original Article
Read Online
Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.
Read Offline
Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.
