Martin Kuldorff Debunks CDC Study Showing COVID-Recovered More Likely to be Hospitalized than Vaccinated
In this November 2, 2021 article published by The Brownstone Institute, Martin Kuldorff dissects two studies with contrary conclusions: the Israeli study1https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/09/01/largest-scientific-study-covid-recovered-individuals-better-protected-from-delta-compared-to-the-vaccinated/ which showed that the vaccinated had 27 times higher risk of symptomatic infection compared to the COVID recovered, and the CDC study2https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7044e1.htmshowing that the COVID-recovered are five times more likely to be hospitalized for COVID than the vaccinated. Kuldorf says, “Both studies can’t be right”.
Kuldorff goes on to discuss the technical details that make the analysis made by the CDC study inferior compared to the Israeli study. He says that the CDC failed to answer the question: “Would the COVID recovered benefit from being vaccinated?”
Meanwhile, based on the solid data presented by the Israeli study, the COVID recovered have stronger and longer-lasting immunity against COVID disease compared to the vaccinated. Kulldorf adds, “there is no reason to prevent them from activities that are permitted to the vaccinated. That is in fact discriminatory”.
Editor’s Note: This review written by Kuldorff can be difficult for laypeople to understand, but people who have a background in statistics and research can easily fact-check his analysis. We add this article on this website for this reason, as well as to show people that the CDC study has already been debunked by a qualified professional.
For those who don’t know, Kuldorff is a professor of medicine at the Harvard Medical School. He is also a statistician. He currently serves as a member of the scientific advisory committee to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and a member of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). His voice is not one to ignore.
Kuldorff has been very vocal about his position since the beginning of the pandemic. As a co-author of The Great Barrington Declaration, Kuldorff has advocated for the focused protection of older, high-risk groups. He has also been questioning the strategy of vaccinating younger people.
Based on Kuldorff’s analysis, we must begin to ask our governments: why are they disregarding natural immunity when it is proven to be robust and protective? [Also read Hundreds of Researches Confirm Natural Immunity is Complete and Longer-lasting, More Powerful than COVID Vaccines, The Science is Clear: Our Immune System Can Confer Natural Immunity Against COVID and its Variants, New study: T-cells induced by COVID infection can respond to new SARS-CoV-2 variants, Our immune system evolves to fight coronavirus variants].
Why are governments coercing citizens to take the vaccines when COVID’s infection fatality rate is not too different from that of the normal flu, and if the natural immunity is more powerful than vaccines?
Read Original Article
Read Online
Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.
Read Offline
Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.
