This June 21, 2021, article for National Pulse, Raheem Kassam, and Natalie Winters reports on an interview with Dr. Anthony Fauci where he revealed the contents of the redacted (censored) email from Facebook’s CEO, Mark Zuckerberg. In the interview, Fauci said, “Mark said, hey, is there anything that we can do to help out to get the messages out, the right public health messages? I have a very important medium here on Facebook. Can I help? And as a matter of fact, if you guys don’t have enough resources and money to do some of the things you want, just let us know.”

The National Pulse writers comment on this: “The offer of private funding for him and his organizations, despite being a government employee. In any other world, this would be constituted as a form of a bribe towards a government official.”

Editor’s Note: If this conversation with Mark Zuckerberg was truly above board as Fauci claims, why did they need to delete that one sentence from Zuckerberg’s email?

This article only shows us how Zuckerberg and Fauci conspired to remove all alternative information on Facebook, effectively impinging on people’s right to information. Who are they to act as gatekeepers of information? What authority gave them to decide on which information is “right” or “wrong”, and what can be accessed by people?

Read Original Article