The article describes how scientists who questioned mainstream COVID-19 policies suffered censorship, slander, and career implications and how they were frequently silenced by social media sites such as Facebook due to government pressure. It demonstrates how genuine information regarding COVID-19 was repressed, and scientists who spoke out were accused of spreading “misinformation.” The Great Barrington Declaration faced misleading allegations, discouraging support for its ideas despite their validity. The paper contends that science thrives on questioning and silencing disagreement weakens public trust in research and health.

Editor’s Note: This article provides another example of mainstream media (MSM) slowly loosening its grip on previously censored narratives, driven by the overwhelming evidence being exposed on influential platforms like X. Scientists who dared to question COVID-19 policies were once vilified, but the tide is turning as more of these critical perspectives gain visibility. Newsweek, in particular, stands out for its attempt to balance differing perspectives on controversial topics, a rare instance of genuine journalistic work in today’s seemingly watered-down media landscape.

The core issue remains: when criticism is stifled, science ceases to be about the quest for truth and becomes an oppressive tool, as it sacrifices the very skepticism that drives progress. This article serves as a reminder that open debate, rather than dogmatic conformity, is essential to science.

Read Original Article