Recent research uncovers the extensive use of behavioral science strategies by the UK government to manipulate public behavior. These tactics rely on fear, shame, and scapegoating, as prominently seen during the COVID-19 pandemic. The widespread state-sponsored psychological manipulation raises serious ethical questions about technocratic control. This article challenges the acceptability of these practices in a democratic society and calls for reconsidering individual decision-making rights. The conclusion aims to spark awareness and encourage visible dissent against these tactics.
Editor’s Note: This extensive use of behavioral science strategies to manipulate public behavior brings us alarmingly close to a dystopian society. By relying on fear, shame, and scapegoating, these tactics strip individuals of their essence and autonomy. When fear becomes the primary motivator for compliance, the freedom and personal agency of a human being is undermined.
This psychological manipulation by state-sponsored entities raises ethical concerns about technocratic control and the deterioration of democratic values. Accepting such practices without transparent debate signals a dangerous shift towards authoritarianism. Often this coercion is masked under the guise of being for the “public good.”
Read Original Article
Read Online
Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.
Read Offline
Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.