In this October 26, 2022 article published by The Lancet, public health experts explore the legacy of COVI to childhood vaccination in the US. The authors acknowledge that the pandemic will not only cause disruptions in vaccine delivery, but it could also affect trust, risk perception, vaccine mandates, and health equity.

They also suggest that in order to combat these effects, health organizations such as the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) should continue work to “strengthen” vaccine confidence.

Editor’s Note: It is very clear that the authors of the article attached below are all pro-vaccine. Their recommendations are all geared towards eradicating vaccine hesitancy, which they insinuate to be unscientific and the effect of misinformation.

Despite its pro-vax stance, this article is important because it has revealed to us several facts that are being denied by both mainstream media and the health establishment.

First, the article has acknowledged that there is a growing distrust in the vaccine enterprise, which extends to the health institutions that promote them.

Second, many parents are now raising concerns about the risks of vaccines in general.

Third, vaccine mandates among school-aged children are being questioned, a by-product of the illogical and unscientific mandates imposed by health authorities during the COVID scamdemic.

Lastly, many of the targetted “minority” groups have opted out of the COVID shots, as evidenced by the “current two-fold difference in COVID-19 vaccine receipt across the rural-urban continuum in the USA”.

The authors are recommending the widespread collection of data to “help us better understand vaccine refusal patterns (eg, identify when vaccine refusers are not part of historically marginalized populations), and monitor progress towards eliminating disparities”. This article does not recognize the reality that some “vaccine refusers” have the right to do so, nor does it acknowledge that some of those who refuse the shots are people whose families experienced severe adverse events.

Using seemingly neutral languaging, this article is nothing more than propaganda. It is promoting surveillance in the guise of “health equity”. It is also recommending censorship and controlling narratives all in the guise of combatting “misinformation”.

Read Original Article