According to an article on Rebel News, the Global Vaccine Alliance (Gavi), backed by Bill Gates, has identified misinformation as a significant threat to global health, overshadowing issues like chronic diseases, hunger, and lack of access to clean water. Gavi is promoting strategies to combat misinformation, such as prioritizing key issues like pandemics and vaccines, carefully targeting audiences, and weakening misinformation with facts rather than direct debunking. Critics argue that Gavi’s approach focuses more on managing narratives than fostering open dialogue and that Gavi’s close ties to the pharmaceutical industry raise concerns about its true focus: global health or pharmaceutical profits.

Editor’s Note: As we are now on the heels of the tumultuous era of COVID-19 it is important to look back and harvest the lessons it left us. One of the glaring lessons, at least for us here at CCH, is that suppression of scientific discourse and the demonization of dissenting voices is never a good sign for scientific progress. It could lead to deaths, degrade human institutions, and lead to anarchy, which in turn, enables would-be masters of humanity to take power.

Misinformation is not the culprit here. It is censorship. We must remember the mainstream media’s role in disseminating misinformation and propaganda during the COVID period has been exposed numerously, revealing a stark contrast between the narratives they promoted and the realities that have since emerged. Those once labeled as “conspiracy theorists” for questioning the safety and necessity of COVID vaccines are now vindicated, as evidence mounts that these vaccines were indeed experimental, detrimental to health and life, and unnecessary for younger and healthier populations.

The mantra of “safe and effective” has given way to revelations of waning efficacy against new variants and potential long-term harm, particularly among the young and healthy. This saga underscores the dangers of stifling open debate and the importance of scrutinizing information, even when it comes from seemingly authoritative sources.

Read Original Article