How Pandemic Mandates Shaped Global Health and Mortality
Denis Rancourt contends that the extra deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic were mostly caused by biological and psychological stress from mandates, medical interventions, and socioeconomic upheavals rather than the virus itself. He attributes many deaths to aspiration pneumonia misdiagnosed as COVID-19, compounded by denial of treatments like antibiotics and ivermectin. Rancourt points out that increased mortality frequently followed vaccination rollouts, which could have weakened immune systems or produced vaccine toxicity. He underlines that socioeconomic tensions, seclusion, and intensive medical interventions contributed significantly to immunosuppression and increased mortality. His findings contradict the concept of a virus-driven pandemic, arguing that coordinated actions resulted in widespread health consequences.
Editor’s Note: This research confirms what many thought but felt powerless to express behind the loud noise of vaccine mandates and forceful government initiatives. Fear-driven tactics dominated the public narrative, stifling other perspectives and undermining critical discussions about the measures’ broader ramifications.
Now, as the dust settles, the long-term effects of these unnecessary mandates are becoming painfully evident, with millions of people worldwide grappling with health and economic fallout. While certain entities profited immensely during this period, many ordinary individuals are left bearing the consequences physically, emotionally, and financially— for years to come. [See also: The Cost of Fear-Driven COVID Policies]
Read Original Article
Read Online
Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.
Read Offline
Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.