With William Barrett Travis’s defiance at the Alamo as a benchmark for this opinion piece, the writer compares it to the current situation where Ukraine, the U.S., and the E.U. rejected Putin’s ceasefire offer, which involved Ukraine giving up several provinces and remaining neutral. The article questions whether Americans and Europeans are willing to support a war over regions unfamiliar to most of them. It also criticizes the media’s omission of the provinces’ names, suggesting it shows a disconnect with Western audiences.
Editor’s Note: Western support for Ukraine by way of military aid and discussions of sending troops aims to bolster its defense but risks escalating the conflict between Ukraine and Russia. There are reports of Ukrainian war weariness and internal dissent, along with President Zelensky’s suspension of elections and imprisonment of pro-negotiation leaders, highlighting the war’s human toll and political complexities.
The media’s omissions of the names of the provinces in the ceasefire offer suggest a disconnect with Western audiences. Another veil is the allegations of U.S. financial interests in Ukraine, adding a layer of cynicism. Is this really the look of supporting democratic values?
Read Original Article
Read Online
Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.
Read Offline
Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.
The West’s leadership being much controlled by secret societies seems not to be interested with a ceasefire or a peace negotiation. It seems the West would find ways to continue the conflict or turn the whole of NATO against Russia. Just check this out before its deleted: https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1804715215998636326