By 2028, the UN-led 50-in-5 campaign—backed by individuals like Bill Gates—aims to create a global digital public infrastructure that integrates biometric data, digital IDs, and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).
Critics worry that it will centralize control, allowing governments to watch and control people’s lives, while supporters assert that it will improve innovation and access.
The increasing demand for such systems is demonstrated by both historical instances, such as digital health certificates during COVID-19, and new technologies, such as blockchain-based asset tokenization. Critics worry that these technologies endanger individual liberties and autonomy by prioritizing control over advantages.
Editor’s Note: The rapid push toward a global digital public infrastructure, as described, raises serious concerns about personal freedoms, inequality, and unchecked power.
The centralized nature of digital IDs, CBDCs, and biometric systems allows for widespread monitoring and manipulation, notwithstanding supporters’ claims of ease of use and accessibility.
While people, particularly those in vulnerable communities, incur the dangers, those with hidden agendas—governments vying for power and businesses making money off the infrastructure—stand to benefit the most.
Many people are essentially shut out of vital services and economic disparities are widened because they cannot afford the devices or access needed to engage in this system.
The promise of innovation is overshadowed by the danger of turning individuals into mere data points in a system designed for control rather than empowerment.
[See other articles about the caveat of the ongoing push for digital infrastructures on our sister site Fully Human: here, here, and here]
Read Original Article
Read Online
Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.
Read Offline
Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.
The PRC and the BFP has left no option for its clients to use cash in paying for fees. Will the LTO be next to follow? Slowly our government agencies are shifting to digital cash transactions like G-cash payments where clients are obliged to pay service charges for using the G-cash system. Is it not a type of corruption where we are forced to use G-cash, a private business, and pay them a fraction of our money for their services? Sounds like government assisted extortion.