South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol declared martial law, citing “anti-state” opposition activities, but withdrew the order after lawmakers overwhelmingly voted to block it. The declaration, lasting only six hours, sparked outrage and evoked memories of past military rule, including the 1980 Gwangju Uprising. Yoon, a conservative leader with plummeting approval ratings, has faced criticism for controversial decisions, scandals, and governance challenges. His move to impose martial law highlighted growing tensions between his administration and the National Assembly, which he accused of undermining democracy. The incident has raised concerns about South Korea’s democratic stability and Yoon’s leadership.
Editor’s Note: The recent declaration and fast removal of martial law by South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol demonstrates how easily some politicians can wield unparalleled authority, even in democracies. Such activities highlight the delicate balance between authority and freedom, particularly when a single individual may bypass public consent in the name of keeping order. Democracy prevailed as lawmakers acted decisively to protect the rights and freedoms of their citizens, proving that true democracy is driven by the voice of the people, not the whims of a leader [Also read WARNING REINFORCED: US AND WORLD ON THE BRINK OF DISASTER, Urgent Need for New Approaches to Democracy and Electoral Politics].
Read Original Article
Read Online
Click the button below if you wish to read the article on the website where it was originally published.
Read Offline
Click the button below if you wish to read the article offline.