Surveillance at the Paris Olympics

The City of Paris has implemented extensive security measures for the Olympic Games, affecting three types of venues: existing sporting venues, temporary sites at historic landmarks, and the Seine River, which will host the opening ceremony. These steps include expanded perimeters, chain-link fences, and QR-coded “Games Passes” for restricted access, leading to notable disruptions in daily life and business. The QR-coded passes intended to streamline security have raised concerns about privacy, freedom of movement, and the normalization of digital surveillance. The restrictions have caused frustration among residents, traffic chaos, and economic losses for local businesses. Critics argue that the use of these technologies reflects a troubling trend towards increased control and surveillance, which is incompatible with the values of a free society.

Editor’s Note: This scenario is reminiscent of George Orwell’s dystopian novel “1984,” where surveillance is used to control and manipulate the population. Similarly, Michel Foucault’s concept of the panopticon, a structure designed to allow a watchman to observe all inmates of an institution without them knowing whether they are being watched, provides a powerful metaphor for the potential implications of these security measures. When people internalize that they are being watched, it’s hard to think for themselves that they are truly free.

The normalization of digital surveillance in public spaces, even for events as significant as the Olympics, reflects a troubling trend toward increased control and monitoring. While the intent is to ensure safety and security, the impact on freedom of movement, privacy, economic losses, and daily life cannot be overlooked.

Read Original Article